On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:23:29PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > We do return an error when the watermark calculation fails, so > the FIXME claiming otherwise is outdated. Remove it. > > Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 6426af873cef..5d823bdc63a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -5458,10 +5458,6 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > * Note that the DDB allocation above may have added more CRTC's that > * weren't otherwise being modified (and set bits in dirty_pipes) if > * pipe allocations had to change. > - * > - * FIXME: Now that we're doing this in the atomic check phase, we > - * should allow skl_update_pipe_wm() to return failure in cases where > - * no suitable watermark values can be found. > */ > for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, cstate, i) { > struct intel_crtc_state *intel_cstate = > -- > 2.18.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
