Hi Liviu,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:47:42PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> From: Brian Starkey <[email protected]>
[snip]
>
> +/**
> + * igt_output_set_writeback_fb:
> + * @output: Target output
> + * @fb: Target framebuffer
> + *
> + * This function sets the given @fb to be used as the target framebuffer for
> the
> + * writeback engine at the next atomic commit. It will also request a
> writeback
> + * out fence that will contain the fd number of the out fence created by KMS
> if
> + * the given @fb is valid.
> + */
> +void igt_output_set_writeback_fb(igt_output_t *output, struct igt_fb *fb)
> +{
> + igt_display_t *display = output->display;
> +
> + LOG(display, "%s: output_set_writeback_fb(%d)\n", output->name, fb ?
> fb->fb_id : 0);
> +
> + igt_output_set_prop_value(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK_FB_ID, fb ?
> fb->fb_id : 0);
> + /* only request a writeback out fence if the framebuffer is valid */
> + if (fb)
> + igt_output_set_prop_value(output,
> IGT_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR,
> +
> (ptrdiff_t)&output->writeback_out_fence_fd);
I'm still not sure (ptrdiff_t) is the right type here, (uintptr_t)
seems better.
Thanks,
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
