On 3/5/19 2:05 PM, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
On 3/4/19 4:55 PM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
Replacing the -E2BIG error code return for WOPCM
initialization with -ENODEV. This will prevent the pci from
picking this up as a warning during fault injection testing.
To clarify, we want to silence this:
forgot to paste the log...
<4> [381.569479] i915: probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -7
Daniele
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundare...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
index f82a415ea2ba..a651557e6e4e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
if (i915_inject_load_failure())
- return -E2BIG;
+ return -ENODEV;
Would it be better to just change the final return code in
i915_pci_probe() to ENODEV?
i.e.
err = i915_driver_load(pdev, ent);
if (err)
return i915_error_injected() ? -ENODEV : err;
This way we can test that the possible error codes (E2BIG in this case)
don't hit issues in dedicated cases during onion unwinding.
Daniele
if (guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {
DRM_ERROR("GuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
