This will make hsw_activate_psr1() more easy to read and will make
future modification to TPS registers more easy to review and read.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 831f345b4ad8..2fa2f4c9c935 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -437,32 +437,13 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp 
*intel_dp)
        drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
 }
 
-static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+static u32 psr1_tps_regs_val_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
-       u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
-       u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
-
-       /* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
-        * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
-        */
-       int idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
-
-       /* sink_sync_latency of 8 means source has to wait for more than 8
-        * frames, we'll go with 9 frames for now
-        */
-       idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
-       val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
-
-       val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
-       if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
-               val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
-
-       if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
-               val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
+       u32 val = 0;
 
        if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us == 0)
-               val |=  EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
+               val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
        else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
                val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us;
        else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
@@ -471,7 +452,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
                val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
 
        if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us == 0)
-               val |=  EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
+               val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
        else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
                val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us;
        else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
@@ -485,6 +466,35 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        else
                val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
 
+       return val;
+}
+
+static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+{
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
+       u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
+       u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
+
+       /* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
+        * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
+        */
+       int idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
+
+       /* sink_sync_latency of 8 means source has to wait for more than 8
+        * frames, we'll go with 9 frames for now
+        */
+       idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
+       val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
+
+       val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
+       if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
+               val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
+
+       if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
+               val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
+
+       val |= psr1_tps_regs_val_get(intel_dp);
+
        if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
                val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
 
-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to