On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 07:02:10PM +0300, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 10:10 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Fix the order of lane, port parameters passed to the register macro.
> > 
> > Note that this was already partly fixed by commit
> > 37fc7845df7b6 ("drm/i915: Call MG_DP_MODE() macro with the right
> > parameters order")
> > 
> > Fixes: 58106b7d816e1 ("drm/i915: Make MG PHY macros semantically
> > consistent")
> > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Aditya Swarup <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index 24f9106efcc6..f181c26f62fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -2905,21 +2905,20 @@ static void
> > icl_enable_phy_clock_gating(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> > >base.base.dev);
> >     enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> >     enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> > -   i915_reg_t mg_regs[2] = { MG_DP_MODE(0, port), MG_DP_MODE(1,
> > port) };
> >     u32 val;
> > -   int i;
> > +   int ln;
> >  
> >     if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE)
> >             return;
> >  
> > -   for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mg_regs); i++) {
> > -           val = I915_READ(mg_regs[i]);
> > +   for (ln = 0; ln < 2; ln++) {
> > +           val = I915_READ(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port));
> >             val |= MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TR2PWR_GATING |
> >                    MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TRPWR_GATING |
> >                    MG_DP_MODE_CFG_CLNPWR_GATING |
> >                    MG_DP_MODE_CFG_DIGPWR_GATING |
> >                    MG_DP_MODE_CFG_GAONPWR_GATING;
> > -           I915_WRITE(mg_regs[i], val);
> > +           I915_WRITE(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port), val);
> >     }
> >  
> >     val = I915_READ(MG_MISC_SUS0(tc_port));
> > @@ -2938,21 +2937,20 @@ static void
> > icl_disable_phy_clock_gating(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> > >base.base.dev);
> >     enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> >     enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> > -   i915_reg_t mg_regs[2] = { MG_DP_MODE(port, 0), MG_DP_MODE(port,
> > 1) };
> 
> I would split this fix from the change dropping mg_regs or at least
> tell that while you were fixing it you changed the way it reads
> each MG_DP_MODE line.

I don't think it's worth a separate patch, since it's a small change
and quite obvious what and how changed. I can add a note to the commit
message about making things simpler.

> 
> 
> >     u32 val;
> > -   int i;
> > +   int ln;
> >  
> >     if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE)
> >             return;
> >  
> > -   for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mg_regs); i++) {
> > -           val = I915_READ(mg_regs[i]);
> > +   for (ln = 0; ln < 2; ln++) {
> > +           val = I915_READ(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port));
> >             val &= ~(MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TR2PWR_GATING |
> >                      MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TRPWR_GATING |
> >                      MG_DP_MODE_CFG_CLNPWR_GATING |
> >                      MG_DP_MODE_CFG_DIGPWR_GATING |
> >                      MG_DP_MODE_CFG_GAONPWR_GATING);
> > -           I915_WRITE(mg_regs[i], val);
> > +           I915_WRITE(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port), val);
> >     }
> >  
> >     val = I915_READ(MG_MISC_SUS0(tc_port));


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to