On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:20 +0100 Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > When adding sg_page_iter I haven't thought properly through the use case > > for sg lists w/o backing pages - which is specific to the i915 driver - > > so this patchset adds support for this. > > > > It applies on the i915 tree [1], where the iterator is in use already. > > > > [1] git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel [nightly branch] > > i915 patches are already included in linux-next, so should apply on top of > that, too. So can this go in through -mm for 3.10 or should I slurp it in > through drm-intel trees (once it passes review)? I'd like to ditch the > dummy page hack we're currently using (i.e. patch 2). Please slurp it - there's little benefit in spreading it across two trees. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
