On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:55:17PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:54:21AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
From: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>

On TGL the special EDP transcoder is gone and it should be handled by
transcoder A. Add POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A_VDSC to make this
distinction clear and update vdsc code path.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c          | 11 ++++++++---
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index 0c7d4a363deb..15582841fefc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
                return "TRANSCODER_EDP";
        case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC:
                return "TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC";
+       case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A_VDSC:
+               return "TRANSCODER_A_VDSC";
        case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_DSI_A:
                return "TRANSCODER_DSI_A";
        case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_DSI_C:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
index 79262a5bceb4..7761b493608a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
        POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_D,
        POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP,
        POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC,
+       POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A_VDSC,

Two power domains for essentially the same thing seems a bit wasteful.

just reuse the name then?

and on gen12+ check for TRANSCODER_A like below?

Lucas De Marchi


        POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_DSI_A,
        POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_DSI_C,
        POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_A_LANES,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index ffec807b8960..0c75b408d6ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -459,16 +459,21 @@ int intel_dp_compute_dsc_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 enum intel_display_power_domain
 intel_dsc_power_domain(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 {
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = 
to_i915(crtc_state->base.state->dev);
        enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;

        /*
-        * On ICL VDSC/joining for eDP transcoder uses a separate power well PW2
-        * This requires POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC power domain.
+        * On ICL+ VDSC/joining for eDP/A transcoder uses a separate power well
+        * PW2. This requires
+        * POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC/POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A_VDSC power
+        * domain.
         * For any other transcoder, VDSC/joining uses the power well associated
         * with the pipe/transcoder in use. Hence another reference on the
         * transcoder power domain will suffice.
         */
-       if (cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_EDP)
+       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12 && cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A)
+               return POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A_VDSC;
+       else if (cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_EDP)
                return POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC;
        else
                return POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(cpu_transcoder);
--
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to