On 03/07/2019 17:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
To reduce the assumptions of RCS0 in the kernel, we want to make the
debugfs engine agnostic and so we need to adapt the igt parser for
flexibility.

If we could just adequately simulate S3/S4 in the kernel we could forgo
this test entirely...

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
  tests/i915/gem_workarounds.c | 12 ++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_workarounds.c b/tests/i915/gem_workarounds.c
index 403863c0b..81c356f06 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_workarounds.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_workarounds.c
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ igt_main
        igt_fixture {
                FILE *file;
                char *line = NULL;
+               char *str;
                size_t line_size;
                int i, fd;
@@ -261,9 +262,13 @@ igt_main fd = igt_debugfs_open(device, "i915_wa_registers", O_RDONLY);
                file = fdopen(fd, "r");
-               igt_assert(getline(&line, &line_size, file) > 0);
+               igt_require(getline(&line, &line_size, file) > 0);
                igt_debug("i915_wa_registers: %s", line);
-               sscanf(line, "Workarounds applied: %d", &num_wa_regs);
+
+               /* We assume that the first batch is for rcs */

I think you mean "first line".

+               str = strstr(line, "Workarounds applied:");
+               igt_assert(str);
+               sscanf(str, "Workarounds applied: %d", &num_wa_regs);
                igt_require(num_wa_regs > 0);

I have a suspicion all the above section could be simplified using fscanf and just checking return value and errno but that would be asking for too much work for what this is.

wa_regs = malloc(num_wa_regs * sizeof(*wa_regs));
@@ -271,6 +276,9 @@ igt_main
i = 0;
                while (getline(&line, &line_size, file) > 0) {
+                       if (strstr(line, "Workarounds applied:"))
+                               break;
+
                        igt_debug("%s", line);
                        if (sscanf(line, "0x%X: 0x%08X, mask: 0x%08X",
                                   &wa_regs[i].addr,


I just had a thought that since we are fiddling with this we should add engine names into strings. And/or class:instance pairs.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to