On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 03:10:04PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> With the fancy second slice of Haswell, we lost support for Ivybridge
> with its paltry single slice.
> 
> Fixes: 8ddcfd6882a9 ("intel_l3_parity: slice support")
> Testcase: igt/tools_test/sysfs_l3_parity
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

Looks sane.

I wonder if anyone ever used this feature...

> ---
>  tools/intel_l3_parity.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/intel_l3_parity.c b/tools/intel_l3_parity.c
> index d8c997af9..dc3d08048 100644
> --- a/tools/intel_l3_parity.c
> +++ b/tools/intel_l3_parity.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>       for_each_slice(i) {
>               fd[i] = openat(dir, path[i], O_RDWR);
> +             if (fd[i] < 0)
> +                     continue;
> +
>               if (read(fd[i], l3logs[i], NUM_REGS * sizeof(uint32_t)) < 0) {
>                       perror(path[i]);
>                       exit(77);
> @@ -333,6 +336,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>       /* Per slice operations */
>       for_each_slice(i) {
> +             if (fd[i] < 0)
> +                     continue;
> +
>               switch (action) {
>                       case 'l':
>                               dumpit(i);
> @@ -374,6 +380,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>               exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
>  
>       for_each_slice(i) {
> +             if (fd[i] < 0)
> +                     continue;
> +
>               ret = write(fd[i], l3logs[i], NUM_REGS * sizeof(uint32_t));
>               if (ret == -1) {
>                       perror("Writing sysfs");
> -- 
> 2.22.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to