From: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>

For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
release_pages().

This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d
("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions").

Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.bu...@intel.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
---
 mm/gup_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup_benchmark.c b/mm/gup_benchmark.c
index 7dd602d7f8db..515ac8eeb6ee 100644
--- a/mm/gup_benchmark.c
+++ b/mm/gup_benchmark.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int __gup_benchmark_ioctl(unsigned int cmd,
        for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
                if (!pages[i])
                        break;
-               put_page(pages[i]);
+               put_user_page(pages[i]);
        }
        end_time = ktime_get();
        gup->put_delta_usec = ktime_us_delta(end_time, start_time);
-- 
2.22.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to