On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 10:27, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the
> i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the
> process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the
> easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential
> atomic callbacks as the frontbuffer tracking wishes to sleep as it
> flushes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to