On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 15:28, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The premise here is to simply avoiding having to acquire the vm->mutex > inside vma create/destroy to update the vm->unbound_lists, to avoid some > nasty lock recursions later. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/gtt: Relax pd_used assertion Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Replace PIN_NONFAULT w... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Track ggtt fence reser... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Only track bound eleme... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Only track bou... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Replace i915_vma_put_f... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Pull obj->userfault... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting wit... Patchwork
