On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:30:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, Ville Syrjala <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> >
> > Reogranize the HDMI deep color state computation to just
> > loop over possible bpc values. Avoids having to maintain
> > so many variants of the clock etc.
> >
> > The current code also looks confused w.r.t. port_clock vs.
> > bw_constrained. It would happily update port_clock for
> > deep color but then not actually enable deep color due to
> > bw_constrained being set. The new logic handles that case
> > correctly.
> 
> Care to elaborate on that please?

Actually I guess it can't happen because:
- bw_constrained is for fdi only atm and no 10bpc hdmi on those
- we can never come here with pipe_bpp==12 + bw_constrained==true anyway

But looks like before commit 3fad10dbb688 ("drm/i915/icl: Fix setting
10 bit deep color mode") this could have been a problem because we could
have legitimately come here with:

pipe_bpp=10*3
bw_constrained=true
deep_color_possible(12) -> true
 -> port_clock = clock * 12 / 8;
if (!bw_constained)
        pipe_bpp = 12*3;

Ie. we'd have come out with with pipe_bpp=10*3 +
port_clock set up for 12 bpc.

> 
> Some nitpicking below.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 82 ++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> > index e02f0faecf02..ed1a7afc1ffd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> > @@ -2262,8 +2262,7 @@ static bool hdmi_deep_color_possible(const struct 
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >  static bool
> >  intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >                        struct intel_crtc_state *config,
> > -                      int *clock_12bpc, int *clock_10bpc,
> > -                      int *clock_8bpc)
> > +                      int *clock)
> >  {
> >     struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(config->base.crtc);
> >  
> > @@ -2273,10 +2272,7 @@ intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(struct drm_connector 
> > *connector,
> >     }
> >  
> >     /* YCBCR420 TMDS rate requirement is half the pixel clock */
> > -   config->port_clock /= 2;
> > -   *clock_12bpc /= 2;
> > -   *clock_10bpc /= 2;
> > -   *clock_8bpc /= 2;
> > +   *clock /= 2;
> >     config->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420;
> >  
> >     /* YCBCR 420 output conversion needs a scaler */
> > @@ -2302,10 +2298,7 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> > *encoder,
> >     struct drm_scdc *scdc = &connector->display_info.hdmi.scdc;
> >     struct intel_digital_connector_state *intel_conn_state =
> >             to_intel_digital_connector_state(conn_state);
> > -   int clock_8bpc = pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
> > -   int clock_10bpc = clock_8bpc * 5 / 4;
> > -   int clock_12bpc = clock_8bpc * 3 / 2;
> > -   int desired_bpp;
> > +   int bpc, clock = pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
> >     bool force_dvi = intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_OFF_DVI;
> >  
> >     if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
> > @@ -2330,15 +2323,11 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> > *encoder,
> >  
> >     if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK) {
> >             pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 2;
> > -           clock_8bpc *= 2;
> > -           clock_10bpc *= 2;
> > -           clock_12bpc *= 2;
> > +           clock *= 2;
> >     }
> >  
> >     if (drm_mode_is_420_only(&connector->display_info, adjusted_mode)) {
> > -           if (!intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(connector, pipe_config,
> > -                                           &clock_12bpc, &clock_10bpc,
> > -                                           &clock_8bpc)) {
> > +           if (!intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(connector, pipe_config, 
> > &clock)) {
> >                     DRM_ERROR("Can't support YCBCR420 output\n");
> >                     return -EINVAL;
> >             }
> > @@ -2355,41 +2344,44 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> > *encoder,
> >                             intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_ON;
> >     }
> >  
> > -   /*
> > -    * Note that g4x/vlv don't support 12bpc hdmi outputs. We also need
> > -    * to check that the higher clock still fits within limits.
> > -    */
> > -   if (hdmi_deep_color_possible(pipe_config, 12) &&
> > -       hdmi_port_clock_valid(intel_hdmi, clock_12bpc,
> > -                             true, force_dvi) == MODE_OK) {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("picking bpc to 12 for HDMI output\n");
> > -           desired_bpp = 12*3;
> > -
> > -           /* Need to adjust the port link by 1.5x for 12bpc. */
> > -           pipe_config->port_clock = clock_12bpc;
> > -   } else if (hdmi_deep_color_possible(pipe_config, 10) &&
> > -              hdmi_port_clock_valid(intel_hdmi, clock_10bpc,
> > -                                    true, force_dvi) == MODE_OK) {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("picking bpc to 10 for HDMI output\n");
> > -           desired_bpp = 10 * 3;
> > -
> > -           /* Need to adjust the port link by 1.25x for 10bpc. */
> > -           pipe_config->port_clock = clock_10bpc;
> > -   } else {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("picking bpc to 8 for HDMI output\n");
> > -           desired_bpp = 8*3;
> > +   /* for 8bpc */
> > +   pipe_config->port_clock = clock;
> >  
> > -           pipe_config->port_clock = clock_8bpc;
> > -   }
> > +   for (bpc = 12; bpc > 8; bpc -= 2) {
> 
> So I generally don't like loops like this. You enter the loop with 12
> and 10, don't enter with 8 but assume in later code that's what you got
> if not 12 or 10. And, of course, you need to initialize
> pipe_config->port_clock beforehand for that case too.
> 
> Perhaps abstracting the loop to a function would help.

Hmm. I guess. Though maybe I should split even more junk into a few
new functions...

> 
> Now, I think this is still an improvement on the status quo, so up to
> you whether to do that now or later.
> 
> > +           int port_clock;
> > +
> > +           if (!hdmi_deep_color_possible(pipe_config, bpc))
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> > +           /*
> > +            * Need to adjust the port link by:
> > +            *  1.5x for 12bpc
> > +            *  1.25x for 10bpc
> > +            */
> > +           port_clock = clock * bpc / 8;
> > +
> > +           if (hdmi_port_clock_valid(intel_hdmi, port_clock,
> > +                                     true, force_dvi) != MODE_OK)
> > +                   continue;
> >  
> > -   if (!pipe_config->bw_constrained) {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("forcing pipe bpp to %i for HDMI\n", desired_bpp);
> > -           pipe_config->pipe_bpp = desired_bpp;
> > +           pipe_config->port_clock = port_clock;
> > +           break;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   /*
> > +    * pipe_bpp could already be below 8bpc due to
> > +    * FDI bandwidth constraints. We shouldn't bump it
> > +    * back up to 8bpc in that case.
> > +    */
> > +   if (pipe_config->pipe_bpp > bpc * 3)
> > +           pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpc * 3;
> > +   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("picking %dbpc for HDMI output (pipe bpp: %d)\n",
>                                  ^
> 
> Put a space there?

Maybe. The comments in the code are w/o the space, but I guess we could
stick it in there anyway.

> 
> Regardless of the nitpicks,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> > +                 bpc, pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> > +
> >     if (hdmi_port_clock_valid(intel_hdmi, pipe_config->port_clock,
> >                               false, force_dvi) != MODE_OK) {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported HDMI clock, rejecting mode\n");
> > +           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported HDMI clock (%d kHz), rejecting 
> > mode\n",
> > +                         pipe_config->port_clock);
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >     }
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to