When we moved the code to disable crtc's to a separate patch,
we forgot to ensure that for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state_reverse()
was moved as well.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Fixes: 66d9cec8a6c9 ("drm/i915/display: Move the commit_tail() disable sequence 
to separate function")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Cc: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 21 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index b38d842ff6ec..e661e2099118 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -13784,7 +13784,15 @@ static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state)
        struct intel_crtc *crtc;
        int i;
 
-       for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, 
new_crtc_state, i) {
+       /*
+        * Disable CRTC/pipes in reverse order because some features(MST in
+        * TGL+) requires master and slave relationship between pipes, so it
+        * should always pick the lowest pipe as master as it will be enabled
+        * first and disable in the reverse order so the master will be the
+        * last one to be disabled.
+        */
+       for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state_reverse(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
+                                                   new_crtc_state, i) {
                if (!needs_modeset(new_crtc_state))
                        continue;
 
@@ -13963,15 +13971,8 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state)
        if (state->modeset)
                wakeref = intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, 
POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
 
-       /*
-        * Disable CRTC/pipes in reverse order because some features(MST in
-        * TGL+) requires master and slave relationship between pipes, so it
-        * should always pick the lowest pipe as master as it will be enabled
-        * first and disable in the reverse order so the master will be the
-        * last one to be disabled.
-        */
-       for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state_reverse(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
-                                                   new_crtc_state, i) {
+       for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
+                                           new_crtc_state, i) {
                if (needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) ||
                    new_crtc_state->update_pipe) {
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to