On 9/18/2019 1:27 PM, Animesh Manna wrote:
Batch buffer will be created through dsb-reg-write function which can have
single/multiple request based on usecase and once the buffer is ready
commit function will trigger the execution of the batch buffer. All
the registers will be updated simultaneously.

v1: Initial version.
v2: Optimized code few places. (Chris)
v3: USed DRM_ERROR for dsb head/tail programming failure. (Shashank)

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.ma...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h          |  2 ++
  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
index 1d6ce36dbad4..cbf7f2c3300c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
@@ -222,3 +222,45 @@ void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t 
reg, u32 val)
                               (DSB_BYTE_EN << DSB_BYTE_EN_SHIFT) |
                               i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
  }
+
+void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
+{
+       struct intel_crtc *crtc = container_of(dsb, typeof(*crtc), dsb);
+       struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+       enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
+       u32 tail;
+
+       if (!dsb->free_pos)
+               return;
+
+       if (!intel_dsb_enable_engine(dsb))
+               goto reset;
+
+       if (is_dsb_busy(dsb)) {
+               DRM_ERROR("HEAD_PTR write failed - dsb engine is busy.\n");
+               goto reset;
+       }
+       I915_WRITE(DSB_HEAD(pipe, dsb->id), i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma));
+
+       tail = ALIGN(dsb->free_pos * 4, CACHELINE_BYTES);
+       if (tail > dsb->free_pos * 4)
+               memset(&dsb->cmd_buf[dsb->free_pos], 0,
+                      (tail - dsb->free_pos * 4));
+
+       if (is_dsb_busy(dsb)) {
+               DRM_ERROR("TAIL_PTR write failed - dsb engine is busy.\n");
+               goto reset;
+       }
+       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DSB execution started - head 0x%x, tail 0x%x\n",
+                     i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma), tail);
+       I915_WRITE(DSB_TAIL(pipe, dsb->id), i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma) + tail);
+       if (wait_for(!is_dsb_busy(dsb), 1)) {
+               DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for DSB workload completion.\n");
+               goto reset;
+       }
+
+reset:
+       dsb->free_pos = 0;
+       intel_dsb_disable_engine(dsb);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
index d6ced4422814..dca4e632dd3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
@@ -44,5 +44,6 @@ void intel_dsb_put(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
  void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val);
  void intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg,
                                 u32 val);
+void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 2dbaa49f5c74..c77b5066d8dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -11687,6 +11687,8 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
  #define _DSBSL_INSTANCE_BASE          0x70B00
  #define DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id)      (_DSBSL_INSTANCE_BASE + \
                                         (pipe) * 0x1000 + (id) * 100)
+#define DSB_HEAD(pipe, id)             _MMIO(DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) + 0x0)
+#define DSB_TAIL(pipe, id)             _MMIO(DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) + 0x4)
  #define DSB_CTRL(pipe, id)            _MMIO(DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) + 0x8)
  #define   DSB_ENABLE                  (1 << 31)
  #define   DSB_STATUS                  (1 << 0)

As discussed with Jani, I would expect some changes here, but we can do those in a staged manner. For now, LGTM,

Please feel free to use: Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>

Regards

Shashank

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to