On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:25:41PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> For icl+, have hw read out to create hw blob of gamma
> lut values. icl+ platforms supports multi segmented gamma
> mode by default, add hw lut creation for this mode.
> 
> This will be used to validate gamma programming using dsb
> (display state buffer) which is a tgl specific feature.
> 
> Major change done-removal of readouts of coarse and fine segments
> because PAL_PREC_DATA register isn't giving propoer values.
> State checker limited only to "fine segment"
> 
> v2: -readout code for multisegmented gamma has to come
>      up with some intermediate entries that aren't preserved
>      in hardware (Jani N)
>     -linear interpolation (Ville)
>     -moved common code to check gamma_enable to specific funcs,
>      since icl doesn't support that
> v3: -use u16 instead of __u16 [Jani N]
>     -used single lut [Jani N]
>     -improved and more readable for loops [Jani N]
>     -read values directly to actual locations and then fill gaps [Jani N]
>     -moved cleaning to patch 1 [Jani N]
>     -renamed icl_read_lut_multi_seg() to icl_read_lut_multi_segment to
>      make it similar to icl_load_luts()
>     -renamed icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_blob() to
>      icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_lut_values() more sensible, I guess
> v4: -removed interpolated func for creating gamma lut values
>     -removed readouts of fine and coarse segments, failure to read 
> PAL_PREC_DATA
>      correctly
> v5: -added gamma_enable check inside read_luts()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sha...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            |   6 ++
>  2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> index fa44eb73d088..614e0ad386ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,25 @@ static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>       }
>  }
>  
> +static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +     if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
> +     case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> +             return 8;
> +     case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> +             return 10;
> +     case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
> +             return 16;
> +     default:
> +             MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +}
> +
>  int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state)
>  {
>       struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> @@ -1488,7 +1507,9 @@ int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_stat
>               else
>                       return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>       } else {
> -             if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> +             if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> +                     return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> +             else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>                       return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>               else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
>                       return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> @@ -1519,6 +1540,20 @@ static bool intel_color_lut_entry_equal(struct 
> drm_color_lut *lut1,
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
> +                                           struct drm_color_lut *lut2,
> +                                           int lut_size, u32 err)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
> +             if (!err_check(&lut1[i], &lut2[i], err))
> +                     return false;
> +     }
> +
> +     return true;
> +}
> +
>  bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>                          struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
>                          u32 gamma_mode, u32 bit_precision)
> @@ -1537,16 +1572,8 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob 
> *blob1,
>       lut_size2 = drm_color_lut_size(blob2);
>  
>       /* check sw and hw lut size */
> -     switch (gamma_mode) {
> -     case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> -     case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> -             if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
> -                     return false;
> -             break;
> -     default:
> -             MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
> -                     return false;
> -     }
> +     if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
> +             return false;
>  
>       lut1 = blob1->data;
>       lut2 = blob2->data;
> @@ -1554,13 +1581,18 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob 
> *blob1,
>       err = 0xffff >> bit_precision;
>  
>       /* check sw and hw lut entry to be equal */
> -     switch (gamma_mode) {
> +     switch (gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
>       case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>       case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>               if (!intel_color_lut_entry_equal(lut1, lut2,
>                                                lut_size2, err))
>                       return false;
>               break;
> +     case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
> +             if (!intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(lut1, lut2,
> +                                                    lut_size2, err))

I don't think you need a new function for that. Just pass 9 as the size
to intel_color_lut_entry_equal() ?

Hmm, should probably rename that to just intel_color_lut_equal() since
it checks the entire LUT (or at least the specified subset) and not
just a single entry...

> +                     return false;
> +             break;
>       default:
>               MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
>                       return false;
> @@ -1815,6 +1847,63 @@ static void glk_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state)
>               crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, 
> PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
>  }
>  
> +static struct drm_property_blob *
> +icl_read_lut_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +     struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +     int lut_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
> +     enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> +     struct drm_property_blob *blob;
> +     struct drm_color_lut *blob_data;
> +     u32 i, val1, val2;
> +
> +     blob = drm_property_create_blob(&dev_priv->drm,
> +                                     sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) * lut_size,
> +                                     NULL);
> +     if (IS_ERR(blob))
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     blob_data = blob->data;
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
> +             val1 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
> +             val2 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
> +
> +             blob_data[i].red = 
> REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
> +                                
> REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK, val1);
> +             blob_data[i].green = 
> REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
> +                                  
> REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK, val1);
> +             blob_data[i].blue = 
> REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
> +                                 
> REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK, val1);
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * FIXME readouts from PAL_PREC_DATA register aren't giving correct 
> values
> +      * in the case of fine and coarse segments. Restricting readouts only 
> for
> +      * super fine segment as of now.
> +      */
> +
> +     return blob;
> +}
> +
> +static void icl_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +     if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
> +             return;
> +
> +     if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
> +         GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)

Please make this a switch statement.

I pushed patches 1-2 to dinq. Thanks.

> +             crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = i9xx_read_lut_8(crtc_state);
> +     else if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
> +              GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED)
> +             crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = 
> icl_read_lut_multi_segment(crtc_state);
> +     else
> +             crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, 
> PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
> +}
> +
>  void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> @@ -1858,6 +1947,7 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  
>               if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
>                       dev_priv->display.load_luts = icl_load_luts;
> +                     dev_priv->display.read_luts = icl_read_luts;
>               } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
>                       dev_priv->display.load_luts = glk_load_luts;
>                       dev_priv->display.read_luts = glk_read_luts;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 1dc067fc57ab..06b6398b7d62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -10584,6 +10584,12 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>  
>  #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_A   0x4A40C
>  #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_B   0x4AC0C
> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK   REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK   REG_GENMASK(29, 20)
> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 14)
> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 10)
> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK  REG_GENMASK(9, 4)
> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK  REG_GENMASK(9, 0)
>  
>  #define PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe)       _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
>                                       _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_A, \
> -- 
> 2.23.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to