Looks good to me, there is a minor comment see below.
On 2019-10-31 at 17:14:20 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Both activate functions and the dc3co disable function were doing the
> same thing, so better move to a function and share.
> Also while at it adding a WARN_ON to catch invalid values.
>
> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <[email protected]>
> Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 43 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 6a9f322d3fca..bb9b5349b72a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -451,22 +451,29 @@ static u32 intel_psr1_get_tp_time(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> return val;
> }
>
> -static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static u8 psr_compute_idle_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> - u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
> - u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> + int idle_frames;
>
> /* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
> * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
> */
> - int idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> -
> - /* sink_sync_latency of 8 means source has to wait for more than 8
> - * frames, we'll go with 9 frames for now
> - */
> + idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
> - val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
> +
> + WARN_ON(idle_frames > 0xf);
> +
> + return idle_frames;
there would be return type mismatch warning.
> +}
> +
> +static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> + u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
> + u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> +
> + val |= psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp) << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
>
> val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> @@ -490,13 +497,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> u32 val;
>
> - /* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
> - * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
> - */
> - int idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> -
> - idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
> - val = idle_frames << EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
> + val = psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp) << EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
>
> val |= EDP_PSR2_ENABLE | EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE;
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> @@ -563,16 +564,10 @@ static void tgl_psr2_enable_dc3co(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> static void tgl_psr2_disable_dc3co(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - int idle_frames;
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.dp;
>
> intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
> - /*
> - * Restore PSR2 idle frame let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known
> - * cases including the off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
> - */
> - idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> - idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
> - psr2_program_idle_frames(dev_priv, idle_frames);
> + psr2_program_idle_frames(dev_priv, psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
> }
>
> static void tgl_dc5_idle_thread(struct work_struct *work)
> --
> 2.23.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
