On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 08:58:45PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 08:55:46PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> > To align with link compliance design existing intel_dp_compliance
> > tool will be used to get the phy request in userspace through uevent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <[email protected]>
>
> I would prefer splitting this patch since sending a uevent is more related
> to the PHY test prep handling and debugfs handling can all be in a separate
> patch.
> I prefer this because debugfs nodes might need to change in the future based
> on more requirements or testing feedback so its better for that to be in
> separate
> patch.
>
> you could add the hotplug event sending part to the prep patch (3/7) and
> mention that
> in the commit message
>
> Debugfs part looks good to me. Have you tested the debugfs nodes and
> validated if this
> information is being written in the correct form?
>
> After the split and validation of debugs nodes:
>
> Acked-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
>
> Manasi
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index 338d3744c5d5..a2b860cf3b93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -5288,8 +5288,10 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >
> > intel_psr_short_pulse(intel_dp);
> >
> > - if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Compliance Test requested\n");
> > + if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING ||
> > + intel_dp->compliance.test_type ==
> > + DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Compliance Test requested\n");
One more change I think here would be good IMO for debugging is that
you should print test_type in DEBUG_KMS
Manasi
> > /* Send a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(&dev_priv->drm);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index cab632791f73..e8b1a8c1015a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -3212,6 +3212,16 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct
> > seq_file *m, void *data)
> >
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_data.vdisplay);
> > seq_printf(m, "bpc: %u\n",
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc);
> > + } else if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type ==
> > + DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN) {
> > + seq_printf(m, "pattern: %d\n",
> > +
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest.phy_pattern);
> > + seq_printf(m, "Number of lanes: %d\n",
> > +
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest.num_lanes);
> > + seq_printf(m, "Link Rate: %d\n",
> > +
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest.link_rate);
> > + seq_printf(m, "level: %02x\n",
> > + intel_dp->train_set[0]);
> > }
> > } else
> > seq_puts(m, "0");
> > --
> > 2.22.0
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
