On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:03 +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav <[email protected]>
> > Sent: maanantai 25. marraskuuta 2019 17.55
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Saarinen, Jani <[email protected]>; 
> > [email protected];
> > Roper, Matthew D <[email protected]>; 
> > [email protected];
> > Sarvela, Tomi P <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Support more QGV points
> > 
> > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 17:31 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:10:49PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy
> > > wrote:
> > > > According to BSpec 53998, there is a mask of max 8 SAGV/QGV
> > > > points
> > > > we need to support.
> > > > 
> > > > Bumping this up to keep the CI happy(currently preventing tests
> > > > to
> > > > run), until all SAGV changes land.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112189
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 22
> > > > +++++++++++++++++--
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  6 +++++-
> > > >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > > index 86e75e858008..d1b805b30177 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct intel_qgv_point {  };
> > > > 
> > > >  struct intel_qgv_info {
> > > > -       struct intel_qgv_point points[3];
> > > > +       struct intel_qgv_point points[I915_NUM_SAGV_POINTS];
> > > >         u8 num_points;
> > > >         u8 num_channels;
> > > >         u8 t_bl;
> > > > @@ -276,15 +276,27 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private
> > > > *dev_priv)
> > > >  static unsigned int intel_max_data_rate(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private
> > > > *dev_priv,
> > > >                                         int
> > 
> > num_planes)
> > > >  {
> > > > -       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > > > +       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > > > +               /*
> > > > +                * Any bw group has same amount of QGV points
> > > > +                */
> > > > +               const struct intel_bw_info *bi =
> > > > +                       &dev_priv->max_bw[0];
> > > > +               unsigned int min_bw = UINT_MAX;
> > > > +               int i;
> > > > +
> > > >                 /*
> > > >                  * FIXME with SAGV disabled maybe we can assume
> > > >                  * point 1 will always be used? Seems to match
> > > >                  * the behaviour observed in the wild.
> > > >                  */
> > > > -               return min3(icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes,
> > > > 0),
> > > > -                           icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes,
> > 
> > 1),
> > > > -                           icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes,
> > 
> > 2));
> > > > +               for (i = 0; i < bi->num_qgv_points; i++) {
> > > > +                       unsigned int bw = icl_max_bw(dev_priv,
> > > > num_planes, i);
> > > > +
> > > > +                       min_bw = min(bw, min_bw);
> > > > +               }
> > > > +               return min_bw;
> > > > +       }
> > > >         else
> > > >                 return UINT_MAX;
> > > >  }
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index
> > > > fdae5a919bc8..d45a9ffaed4f
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > @@ -621,6 +621,9 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
> > > > 
> > > >  #define I915_ENGINE_WEDGED_TIMEOUT  (60 * HZ)  /* Reset but no
> > > > recovery? */
> > > > 
> > > > +/* BSpec precisely defines this */
> > > > +#define I915_NUM_SAGV_POINTS 8
> > > 
> > > I think everything else talks about "QGV points" rather than
> > > "SAGV
> > > points" now? Would be nice to be consistent.
> > 
> > Agree, _SAGV_ is not that accurate here.
> > Will change the naming.
> 
> Can we do that while merging? 

I have already changed the name, will now send a v3,
as this is a trivial fix, I guess we can then push it.

> 
> > 
> > Stan
> > 
> > > 
> > > Apart from that
> > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > >  struct ddi_vbt_port_info {
> > > >         /* Non-NULL if port present. */
> > > >         const struct child_device_config *child; @@ -1232,7
> > > > +1235,8 @@
> > > > struct drm_i915_private {
> > > >         } dram_info;
> > > > 
> > > >         struct intel_bw_info {
> > > > -               unsigned int deratedbw[3]; /* for each QGV
> > > > point */
> > > > +               /* for each QGV point */
> > > > +               unsigned int deratedbw[I915_NUM_SAGV_POINTS];
> > > >                 u8 num_qgv_points;
> > > >                 u8 num_planes;
> > > >         } max_bw[6];
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > 
> > > 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to