The unaligned ioread32() will make us read byte by byte looking for the
vbt. We could just as well have done a ioread8() + a shift and avoid the
extra confusion on how we are looking for "$VBT".

However when using ACPI it's guaranteed the VBT is 4-byte aligned
per spec, so we can probably assume it here as well.

v2: do not try to simplify the loop by eliminating the auxiliary counter
(Jani and Ville)

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index 56e566945e98..fec6752b1f56 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                return NULL;
 
        /* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
-       for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) {
+       for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i += 4) {
                if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)"$VBT"))
                        continue;
 
-- 
2.24.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to