On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 02:25:11PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> If the CRTC is going from enabled to disabled and it is a port sync
> slave, it needs to check to the old state to be disabled before the
> port sync master.
Yes this makes sense, thank you for the fix
Reviewed-by: Manasi navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
Manasi
>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 1f1cd7578706..3062578e2bdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14497,8 +14497,8 @@ static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> * slave CRTCs are disabled first and then master CRTC since
> * Slave vblanks are masked till Master Vblanks.
> */
> - if (is_trans_port_sync_mode(new_crtc_state)) {
> - if (is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state))
> + if (is_trans_port_sync_mode(old_crtc_state)) {
> + if (is_trans_port_sync_master(old_crtc_state))
> intel_trans_port_sync_modeset_disables(state,
> crtc,
>
> old_crtc_state,
> --
> 2.24.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
