We track the status of the GuC much more closely now and we expect the
enable/disable functions to be correctly called only once. If this isn't
true we do want to flag it as a flow failure (via the BUG_ON in the ctch
functions) and not silently ignore the call.

Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
index f74ba4750a94..b23b46619742 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
@@ -862,9 +862,6 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
        struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
        struct intel_guc_ct_channel *ctch = &ct->host_channel;
 
-       if (ctch->enabled)
-               return 0;
-
        return ctch_enable(guc, ctch);
 }
 
@@ -877,8 +874,5 @@ void intel_guc_ct_disable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
        struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
        struct intel_guc_ct_channel *ctch = &ct->host_channel;
 
-       if (!ctch->enabled)
-               return;
-
        ctch_disable(guc, ctch);
 }
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to