On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, "Manna, Animesh" <animesh.ma...@intel.com> wrote:
> Sure Manasi, I will make intel_get_adjust_train() non-static and keep in 
> intel_dp_link_training.c.
> Now as suggested by Jani before 
> (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/345823/?series=71121&rev=1#comment_640087)
>  other non static functions are not following the rule,
> should I change the function name or keep it as it is?

Please prefix it intel_dp_. I think intel_dp_link_training_ is too long
here. :)

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to