On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:24:20AM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 20:36, Ville Syrjala > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > > > > > The driver never sets mode->private_flags so copying > > > it back and forth is entirely pointless. Stop doing it. > > > > > > Also drop private_flags from the tracepoint. > > > > > > Cc: Rob Clark <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Sean Paul <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > > > Perhaps the msm team has a WIP which makes use of it ? > > Maybe if it's one of them five year projects. But anyways, > with an atomic driver there are certainly better ways to > handle this.
Yeah with atomic you have your display mode in drm_crtc_state, which you're subposed to subclass so that you can have terabytes of private state. At least in theory :-) ->private_flags was really only useful in pre-atomic drivers. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
