On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:00:43PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> According to BSpec 53998, we should try to
> restrict qgv points, which can't provide
> enough bandwidth for desired display configuration.
> 
> Currently we are just comparing against all of
> those and take minimum(worst case).
> 
> v2: Fixed wrong PCode reply mask, removed hardcoded
>     values.
> 
> v3: Forbid simultaneous legacy SAGV PCode requests and
>     restricting qgv points. Put the actual restriction
>     to commit function, added serialization(thanks to Ville)
>     to prevent commit being applied out of order in case of
>     nonblocking and/or nomodeset commits.
> 
> v4:
>     - Minor code refactoring, fixed few typos(thanks to James Ausmus)
>     - Change the naming of qgv point
>       masking/unmasking functions(James Ausmus).
>     - Simplify the masking/unmasking operation itself,
>       as we don't need to mask only single point per request(James Ausmus)
>     - Reject and stick to highest bandwidth point if SAGV
>       can't be enabled(BSpec)
> 
> v5:
>     - Add new mailbox reply codes, which seems to happen during boot
>       time for TGL and indicate that QGV setting is not yet available.
> 
> v6:
>     - Increase number of supported QGV points to be in sync with BSpec.
> 
> v7: - Rebased and resolved conflict to fix build failure.
>     - Fix NUM_QGV_POINTS to 8 and moved that to header file(James Ausmus)
> 
> v8: - Don't report an error if we can't restrict qgv points, as SAGV
>       can be disabled by BIOS, which is completely legal. So don't
>       make CI panic. Instead if we detect that there is only 1 QGV
>       point accessible just analyze if we can fit the required bandwidth
>       requirements, but no need in restricting.
> 
> v9: - Fix wrong QGV transition if we have 0 planes and no SAGV
>       simultaneously.
> 
> v10: - Fix CDCLK corruption, because of global state getting serialized
>        without modeset, which caused copying of non-calculated cdclk
>        to be copied to dev_priv(thanks to Ville for the hint).
> 
> v11: - Remove unneeded headers and spaces(Matthew Roper)
>      - Remove unneeded intel_qgv_info qi struct from bw check and zero
>        out the needed one(Matthew Roper)
>      - Changed QGV error message to have more clear meaning(Matthew Roper)
>      - Use state->modeset_set instead of any_ms(Matthew Roper)
>      - Moved NUM_SAGV_POINTS from i915_reg.h to i915_drv.h where it's used
>      - Keep using crtc_state->hw.active instead of .enable(Matthew Roper)
>      - Moved unrelated changes to other patch(using latency as parameter
>        for plane wm calculation, moved to SAGV refactoring patch)
> 
> v12: - Fix rebase conflict with own temporary SAGV/QGV fix.
>      - Remove unnecessary mask being zero check when unmasking
>        qgv points as this is completely legal(Matt Roper)
>      - Check if we are setting the same mask as already being set
>        in hardware to prevent error from PCode.
>      - Fix error message when restricting/unrestricting qgv points
>        to "mask/unmask" which sounds more accurate(Matt Roper)
>      - Move sagv status setting to icl_get_bw_info from atomic check
>        as this should be calculated only once.(Matt Roper)
>      - Edited comments for the case when we can't enable SAGV and
>        use only 1 QGV point with highest bandwidth to be more
>        understandable.(Matt Roper)
> 
> v13: - Moved max_data_rate in bw check to closer scope(Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Changed comment for zero new_mask in qgv points masking function
>        to better reflect reality(Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Simplified bit mask operation in qgv points masking function
>        (Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Moved intel_qgv_points_mask closer to gen11 SAGV disabling,
>        however this still can't be under modeset condition(Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Packed qgv_points_mask as u8 and moved closer to pipe_sagv_mask
>        (Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Extracted PCode changes to separate patch.(Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Now treat num_planes 0 same as 1 to avoid confusion and
>        returning max_bw as 0, which would prevent choosing QGV
>        point having max bandwidth in case if SAGV is not allowed,
>        as per BSpec(Ville Syrjälä)
>      - Do the actual qgv_points_mask swap in the same place as
>        all other global state parts like cdclk are swapped.
>        In the next patch, this all will be moved to bw state as
>        global state, once new global state patch series from Ville
>        lands
> 
> v14: - Now using global state to serialize access to qgv points
>      - Added global state locking back, otherwise we seem to read
>        bw state in a wrong way.
> 
> v15: - Added TODO comment for near atomic global state locking in
>        bw code.
> 
> v16: - Fixed intel_atomic_bw_* functions to be intel_bw_* as discussed
>        with Jani Nikula.
>      - Take bw_state_changed flag into use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Cc: James Ausmus <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c      | 184 +++++++++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h      |   9 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 125 ++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h              |   3 +
>  4 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index d5be603b8b03..4986a5464700 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
>  #include "intel_bw.h"
>  #include "intel_display_types.h"
>  #include "intel_sideband.h"
> +#include "intel_atomic.h"
> +#include "intel_pm.h"
> +
>  
>  /* Parameters for Qclk Geyserville (QGV) */
>  struct intel_qgv_point {
> @@ -113,6 +116,26 @@ static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +                               u32 points_mask)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     /* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */
> +     ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, ICL_PCODE_SAGV_DE_MEM_SS_CONFIG,
> +                             points_mask,
> +                             GEN11_PCODE_POINTS_RESTRICTED_MASK,
> +                             GEN11_PCODE_POINTS_RESTRICTED,
> +                             1);
> +
> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable qgv points (%d)\n", ret);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>                             struct intel_qgv_info *qi)
>  {
> @@ -240,6 +263,16 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv, const struct intel
>                       break;
>       }
>  
> +     /*
> +      * In case if SAGV is disabled in BIOS, we always get 1
> +      * SAGV point, but we can't send PCode commands to restrict it
> +      * as it will fail and pointless anyway.
> +      */
> +     if (qi.num_points == 1)
> +             dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> +     else
> +             dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED;
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -259,7 +292,7 @@ static unsigned int icl_max_bw(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>               if (qgv_point >= bi->num_qgv_points)
>                       return UINT_MAX;
>  
> -             if (num_planes >= bi->num_planes)
> +             if (num_planes >= bi->num_planes || !num_planes)
>                       return bi->deratedbw[qgv_point];
>       }
>  
> @@ -277,34 +310,6 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>               icl_get_bw_info(dev_priv, &icl_sa_info);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int intel_max_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -                                     int num_planes)
> -{
> -     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> -             /*
> -              * Any bw group has same amount of QGV points
> -              */
> -             const struct intel_bw_info *bi =
> -                     &dev_priv->max_bw[0];
> -             unsigned int min_bw = UINT_MAX;
> -             int i;
> -
> -             /*
> -              * FIXME with SAGV disabled maybe we can assume
> -              * point 1 will always be used? Seems to match
> -              * the behaviour observed in the wild.
> -              */
> -             for (i = 0; i < bi->num_qgv_points; i++) {
> -                     unsigned int bw = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_planes, i);
> -
> -                     min_bw = min(bw, min_bw);
> -             }
> -             return min_bw;
> -     } else {
> -             return UINT_MAX;
> -     }
> -}
> -
>  static unsigned int intel_bw_crtc_num_active_planes(const struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>       /*
> @@ -418,11 +423,16 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>       struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
> -     struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
> -     unsigned int data_rate, max_data_rate;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> +     unsigned int data_rate;
>       unsigned int num_active_planes;
>       struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>       int i, ret;
> +     u32 allowed_points = 0;
> +     unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0;
> +     unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
> +     u32 mask = (1 << num_qgv_points) - 1;
>  
>       /*
>        * For earlier Gens let's consider bandwidth changed if ddb 
> requirements,
> @@ -430,11 +440,11 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
>        */
>       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
>               if (state->ddb_state_changed) {
> -                     bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> -                     if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> -                             return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> +                     new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> +                     if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> +                             return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);

Lot's of rename noise in the patch. Can't really see what's going on
unless those are split out.

>  
> -                     ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&bw_state->base);
> +                     ret = 
> intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
>                       if (ret)
>                               return ret;
>  
> @@ -465,45 +475,107 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
>                   old_active_planes == new_active_planes)
>                       continue;
>  
> -             bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> -             if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> -                     return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> +             new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> +             if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> +                     return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
>  
> -             bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe] = new_data_rate;
> -             bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe] = new_active_planes;
> +             new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe] = new_data_rate;
> +             new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe] = new_active_planes;
>  
>               drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>                           "pipe %c data rate %u num active planes %u\n",
>                           pipe_name(crtc->pipe),
> -                         bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe],
> -                         bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe]);
> +                         new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe],
> +                         new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe]);
>       }
>  
> -     if (!bw_state)
> +     if (!new_bw_state)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&bw_state->base);
> -     if (ret)
> +     ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not lock global state\n");
>               return ret;
> +     }
>  
> -     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Marking bw state changed for atomic state %p\n", state);
> -
> -     state->bw_state_changed = true;
> +     data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
> +     data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000);
>  
> -     data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, bw_state);
> -     num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv, bw_state);
> +     num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
>  
> -     max_data_rate = intel_max_data_rate(dev_priv, num_active_planes);
> +     for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) {
> +             unsigned int max_data_rate;
>  
> -     data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000);
> +             max_data_rate = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_active_planes, i);
> +             /*
> +              * We need to know which qgv point gives us
> +              * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV
> +              * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time
> +              * with watermarks. By that moment we already
> +              * have those, as it is calculated earlier in
> +              * intel_atomic_check,
> +              */
> +             if (max_data_rate > max_bw) {
> +                     max_bw_point = i;
> +                     max_bw = max_data_rate;
> +             }
> +             if (max_data_rate >= data_rate)
> +                     allowed_points |= BIT(i);
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("QGV point %d: max bw %d required %d\n",
> +                           i, max_data_rate, data_rate);
> +     }
>  
> -     if (data_rate > max_data_rate) {
> -             drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> -                         "Bandwidth %u MB/s exceeds max available %d MB/s 
> (%d active planes)\n",
> -                         data_rate, max_data_rate, num_active_planes);
> +     /*
> +      * BSpec states that we always should have at least one allowed point
> +      * left, so if we couldn't - simply reject the configuration for obvious
> +      * reasons.
> +      */
> +     if (allowed_points == 0) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No QGV points provide sufficient memory"
> +                           " bandwidth for display configuration.\n");
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Leave only single point with highest bandwidth, if
> +      * we can't enable SAGV due to the increased memory latency it may
> +      * cause.
> +      */
> +     if (!intel_can_enable_sagv_for_state(state)) {
> +             allowed_points = 1 << max_bw_point;
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV, using single QGV point %d\n",
> +                           max_bw_point);
> +     }
> +     /*
> +      * We store the ones which need to be masked as that is what PCode
> +      * actually accepts as a parameter.
> +      */
> +     new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask = (~allowed_points) & mask;
> +
> +     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("New state %p qgv mask %x\n",
> +                   state, new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask);
> +
> +     old_bw_state = intel_bw_get_old_state(state);
> +     if (IS_ERR(old_bw_state)) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not get old bw state!\n");
> +             return PTR_ERR(old_bw_state);
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If the actual mask had changed we need to make sure that
> +      * the commits are serialized(in case this is a nomodeset, nonblocking)
> +      */
> +     if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask != old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask) {
> +             ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not serialize global state\n");
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Marking bw state changed for atomic state %p\n", 
> state);
> +             state->bw_state_changed = true;
> +     }
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> index c32b5285c12f..b3522389a181 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ struct intel_bw_state {
>        */
>       bool can_sagv;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Current QGV points mask, which restricts
> +      * some particular SAGV states, not to confuse
> +      * with pipe_sagv_mask.
> +      */
> +     u8 qgv_points_mask;
> +
>       unsigned int data_rate[I915_MAX_PIPES];
>       u8 num_active_planes[I915_MAX_PIPES];
>  };
> @@ -56,5 +63,7 @@ int intel_bw_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
>  void intel_bw_crtc_update(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
>                         const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +                               u32 points_mask);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_BW_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 6df836cbe0cd..cb1d10af88ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -15504,6 +15504,105 @@ static void intel_atomic_cleanup_work(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>       intel_atomic_helper_free_state(i915);
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_qgv_points_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)

I think we should move these next to the other sagv code and just
call them somehting like intel_sagv_{pre,post}_plane_update()  to
a) avoid the caller having to know anything about them, b) match
the pattern used for other similar things.

And I think the internals should just be something like:
intel_sagv_pre/post_plane_update()
{
        new_bw_state = get_new_bw_state();
        old_bw_state = get_old_bw_state();

        if (!new_bw_state ||
             new_bw_state->sagv_mask == old_bw_state->sagv_mask)
             return;

        do the pcode dance
}

I don't see a need for any more checks than than because that
would just mean that bw_check() is broken and needs to be fixed.


> +{
> +     struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +     int ret;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> +     u32 new_mask = 0;
> +     unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
> +     unsigned int mask = (1 << num_qgv_points) - 1;
> +
> +     new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> +     if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state)) {
> +             WARN(1, "Could not get new bw_state!\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     old_bw_state = intel_bw_get_old_state(state);
> +     if (IS_ERR(old_bw_state)) {
> +             WARN(1, "Could not get old bw_state!\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     new_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask | 
> new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If new mask is zero - means there is nothing to mask,
> +      * we can only unmask, which should be done in unmask.
> +      */
> +     if (!new_mask)
> +             return;
> +
> +     WARN_ON(new_mask == mask);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
> +      */
> +     if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> +             return;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Restrict required qgv points before updating the configuration.
> +      * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
> +      * time. Also masking should be done before updating the configuration
> +      * and unmasking afterwards.
> +      */
> +     ret = icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not mask required qgv points(%d)\n",
> +                           ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_qgv_points_unmask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +     int ret;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> +     u32 new_mask = 0;
> +
> +     new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> +     if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state)) {
> +             WARN(1, "Could not get new bw_state!\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     old_bw_state = intel_bw_get_old_state(state);
> +     if (IS_ERR(old_bw_state)) {
> +             WARN(1, "Could not get new bw_state!\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     new_mask = new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
> +      */
> +     if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> +             return;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Nothing to unmask
> +      */
> +     if (new_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
> +             return;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Allow required qgv points after updating the configuration.
> +      * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
> +      * time. Also masking should be done before updating the configuration
> +      * and unmasking afterwards.
> +      */
> +     ret = icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not unmask required qgv points(%d)\n",
> +                           ret);
> +}
> +
>  static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
>       struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> @@ -15537,6 +15636,15 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>       for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i)
>               crtc->config = new_crtc_state;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Now we need to check if SAGV needs to be disabled(i.e QGV points
> +      * modified even, when no modeset is done(for example plane updates
> +      * can now trigger that).
> +      */
> +     if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11))
> +             if (state->bw_state_changed)
> +                     intel_qgv_points_mask(state);
> +
>       if (state->modeset) {
>               drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state(dev, 
> &state->base);
>  
> @@ -15546,12 +15654,9 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>                * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV when we
>                * have more then one pipe enabled
>                */
> -             if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> -                     if (state->bw_state_changed) {
> -                             if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv))
> -                                     intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> -                     }
> -             }
> +             if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11))
> +                     if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv))
> +                             intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
>  
>               intel_modeset_verify_disabled(dev_priv, state);
>       }
> @@ -15652,10 +15757,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>               intel_verify_planes(state);
>  
>       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> -             if (state->bw_state_changed) {
> -                     if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv))
> -                             intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> -             }
> +             if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv))
> +                     intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> +     } else if (state->bw_state_changed) {
> +             intel_qgv_points_unmask(state);
>       }
>  
>       drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(&state->base);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 4305ccc4c683..0a589700a071 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -841,6 +841,9 @@ enum intel_pipe_crc_source {
>       INTEL_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_MAX,
>  };
>  
> +/* BSpec precisely defines this */
> +#define NUM_SAGV_POINTS 8
> +
>  #define INTEL_PIPE_CRC_ENTRIES_NR    128
>  struct intel_pipe_crc {
>       spinlock_t lock;
> -- 
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to