On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:38:10 +0300 [email protected] wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > There's little point in increasing the GPU frequency from the delayed > rps work on VLV. Now when the GPU is idle, the GPU frequency actually > keeps dropping gradually until it hits the minimum, whereas previously > it just ping-ponged constantly between RPe and RPe-1. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 96cfb3e..eaf0fa2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -3464,7 +3464,8 @@ static void vlv_rps_timer_work(struct work_struct *work) > * min freq available. > */ > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); > - valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay); > + if (dev_priv->rps.cur_delay > dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay) > + valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay); > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); > } >
Hm that's not what I saw here; I stopped getting the timer interrupts when the GPU went idle. But that could be explained by punit fw differences. So this change looks ok to me. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
