On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 09:26:51AM -0700, Khor, Swee Aun wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> The follow cdclk doesn't looked right, isn’t it should be 96000 and 540000 
> according to their respective divider and ratio?
> ....
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 15 },
> ....
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 552000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 45 },
> ....

Yeah, you're right.  The first one appears to have been removed from the
bspec now and the second one appears to be a typo on my part (ratio
should be 46 instead of 45).

Looks like there have been a couple other recent modifications to the
bspec as well that I should update this patch to capture.  Thanks for
pointing that out!


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> SweeAun
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Matt 
> Roper
> Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2020 1:08 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915/rkl: Add cdclk support
> 
> Note that the 192000 clock frequencies can be achieved with different pairs 
> of ratio+divider, which is something we haven't encountered before.  If any 
> of those ratios were common with other legal cdclk values, then it would mean 
> we could avoid triggering full modesets if we just needed to change the 
> divider.  However at the moment there don't appear to be any valid cdclks 
> that share the same ratio so we can't take advantage of this and it doesn't 
> really matter which approach we use to achieve the 192000 cdclk.  For now our 
> driver functions that operate on the table will just always pick the first 
> entry (lower ratio + lower divider).
> 
> Bspec: 49202
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 979a0241fdcb..4ca87260e8ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1230,6 +1230,40 @@ static const struct intel_cdclk_vals icl_cdclk_table[] 
> = {
>  {}
>  };
> 
> +/*
> + * RKL has multiple divider+ratio pairs that can hit cdclk=192000.  Our
> + * functions to read these tables will just always pick the first one
> +which
> + * should be fine since there's no other valid cdclk value that can be
> +achieved
> + * via the same ratio with a different divider (i.e., no opportunity to
> +avoid a
> + * full modeset).
> + */
> +static const struct intel_cdclk_vals rkl_cdclk_table[] = {
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 172800, .divider = 3, .ratio = 27 },
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 20 },
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 15 },
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 307200, .divider = 2, .ratio = 32 },
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 326400, .divider = 4, .ratio = 68 },
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 556800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 58 },
> +{ .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 652800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 68 },
> +
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 176000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 22 },
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 16 },
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 24 },
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 312000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 26 },
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 324000, .divider = 4, .ratio = 54 },
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 552000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 45 },
> +{ .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 648000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 54 },
> +
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 179200, .divider = 3, .ratio = 14 },
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 10 },
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 15 },
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 307200, .divider = 2, .ratio = 16 },
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 326400, .divider = 4, .ratio = 34 },
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 556800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 29 },
> +{ .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 652800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34 },
> +{}
> +};
> +
>  static int bxt_calc_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int min_cdclk)  
> {
>  const struct intel_cdclk_vals *table = dev_priv->cdclk.table; @@ -1405,8 
> +1439,8 @@ static void bxt_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  div = 2;
>  break;
>  case BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5:
> -drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm,
> - IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10,
> +drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) ||
> + (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 && !IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)),
>   "Unsupported divider\n");
>  div = 3;
>  break;
> @@ -1414,7 +1448,8 @@ static void bxt_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>  div = 4;
>  break;
>  case BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4:
> -drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10,
> +drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm,
> + INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 && !IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv),
>   "Unsupported divider\n");
>  div = 8;
>  break;
> @@ -1564,7 +1599,8 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>  break;
>  case 3:
>  drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm,
> - IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10,
> + IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) ||
> + (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 && !IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)),
>   "Unsupported divider\n");
>  divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5;
>  break;
> @@ -1572,7 +1608,8 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>  divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2;
>  break;
>  case 8:
> -drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10,
> +drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm,
> + INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 && !IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv),
>   "Unsupported divider\n");
>  divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4;
>  break;
> @@ -2758,7 +2795,12 @@ u32 intel_read_rawclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>   */
>  void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)  {
> -if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> +if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> +dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = bxt_set_cdclk;
> +dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk = bxt_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> +dev_priv->display.calc_voltage_level = tgl_calc_voltage_level;
> +dev_priv->cdclk.table = rkl_cdclk_table;
> +} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>  dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = bxt_set_cdclk;
>  dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk = bxt_modeset_calc_cdclk;
>  dev_priv->display.calc_voltage_level = tgl_calc_voltage_level;
> --
> 2.24.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to