On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:52:27PM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:03:26PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:45:01PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > Starting from TGL we need to have a separate wm0
> > > values for SAGV and non-SAGV which affects
> > > how calculations are done.
> > > 
> > > v2: Remove long lines
> > > v3: Removed COLOR_PLANE enum references
> > > v4, v5, v6: Fixed rebase conflict
> > > v7: - Removed skl_plane_wm_level accessor from 
> > > skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(Ville)
> > >     - Removed sagv_uv_wm0(Ville)
> > >     - can_sagv->use_sagv_wm(Ville)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |   8 +-
> > >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |   2 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               | 118 +++++++++++++++++-
> > >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > index fd6d63b03489..be5741cb7595 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -13961,7 +13961,9 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc 
> > > *crtc,
> > >           /* Watermarks */
> > >           for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > >                   if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > -                                         &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > +                                         &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > +                     (level == 0 && 
> > > skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > +                                                        
> > > &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0)))
> > >                           continue;
> > >  
> > >                   drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > @@ -14016,7 +14018,9 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc 
> > > *crtc,
> > >           /* Watermarks */
> > >           for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > >                   if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > -                                         &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > +                                         &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > +                     (level == 0 && 
> > > skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > +                                                        
> > > &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0)))
> > >                           continue;
> > >  
> > >                   drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > index 9488449e4b94..8cede29c9562 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > @@ -688,11 +688,13 @@ struct skl_plane_wm {
> > >   struct skl_wm_level wm[8];
> > >   struct skl_wm_level uv_wm[8];
> > >   struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;
> > > + struct skl_wm_level sagv_wm0;
> > >   bool is_planar;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  struct skl_pipe_wm {
> > >   struct skl_plane_wm planes[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> > > + bool use_sagv_wm;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  enum vlv_wm_level {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > index db188efee21e..934a686342ad 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > @@ -3863,25 +3863,35 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct 
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >   return bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject == 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static bool
> > > +tgl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > 
> > Just put the function here instead of adding fwd decalrations.
> > 
> > > +
> > >  static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  {
> > >   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > >   int ret;
> > >   struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > - const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > >   struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > >   const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > >   int i;
> > >  
> > >   for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > >                                    new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > +         bool can_sagv;
> > > +
> > >           new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > >           if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> > >                   return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> > >  
> > >           old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > >  
> > > -         if (skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state))
> > > +         if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > > +                 can_sagv = tgl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state);
> > > +         else
> > > +                 can_sagv = skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state);
> > > +
> > > +         if (can_sagv)
> > >                   new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject &= ~BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > >           else
> > >                   new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > > @@ -3899,6 +3909,24 @@ static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct 
> > > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >                   return ret;
> > >   }
> > >  
> > > + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > +                                  new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > +         struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> > > +
> > > +         /*
> > > +          * Due to drm limitation at commit state, when
> > > +          * changes are written the whole atomic state is
> > > +          * zeroed away => which prevents from using it,
> > > +          * so just sticking it into pipe wm state for
> > > +          * keeping it simple - anyway this is related to wm.
> > > +          * Proper way in ideal universe would be of course not
> > > +          * to lose parent atomic state object from child crtc_state,
> > > +          * and stick to OOP programming principles, which had been
> > > +          * scientifically proven to work.
> > > +          */
> > 
> > More ramblings. Just drop this comment too imo.
> 
> As I understand what is happening here is rather weird, so I thought 
> commenting is good idea.

At least I have no idea what the comment is trying to say.
I see nothing weird hapening here, we're just computing the
state which is totally standard stuff.

> 
> > 
> > > +         pipe_wm->use_sagv_wm = intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, 
> > > new_bw_state);
> > 
> > I think this should be 
> > gen >= 12 && intel_can_enable_sagv();
> > 
> > > + }
> > > +
> > >   if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state) != 
> > > intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, old_bw_state)) {
> > >           ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > >           if (ret)
> > > @@ -4642,12 +4670,39 @@ skl_plane_wm_level(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> > > *crtc_state,
> > >              int level,
> > >              int color_plane)
> > >  {
> > > - const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> > > -         &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> > > + const struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> > > + const struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
> > > +
> > > + if (!level) {
> > > +         if (pipe_wm->use_sagv_wm)
> > > +                 return &wm->sagv_wm0;
> > > + }
> > 
> > if (level == 0 && use_sagv_wm)
> >     return sagv_wm0;
> > 
> > >  
> > >   return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->wm[level] : &wm->uv_wm[level];
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static bool
> > > +tgl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > +{
> > > + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > > + enum plane_id plane_id;
> > > +
> > > + if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> > > +         return true;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> > > +         const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
> > > +                 &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
> > > +         const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> > > +                 &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> > > +
> > > +         if (skl_ddb_entry_size(plane_alloc) < 
> > > wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc)
> > > +                 return false;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int
> > >  skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -4684,7 +4739,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state 
> > > *crtc_state)
> > >                                                    plane_data_rate,
> > >                                                    uv_plane_data_rate);
> > >  
> > > -
> > >   skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(dev_priv, crtc_state, 
> > > total_data_rate,
> > >                                      alloc, &num_active);
> > >   alloc_size = skl_ddb_entry_size(alloc);
> > > @@ -5219,6 +5273,37 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct 
> > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > >   }
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> > > *crtc_state,
> > > +                         const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
> > > +                         struct skl_plane_wm *plane_wm)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> > > + struct skl_wm_level *sagv_wm = &plane_wm->sagv_wm0;
> > > + struct skl_wm_level *levels = plane_wm->wm;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > +  * For Gen12 if it is an L0 we need to also
> > > +  * consider sagv_block_time when calculating
> > > +  * L0 watermark - we will need that when making
> > > +  * a decision whether enable SAGV or not.
> > > +  * For older gens we agreed to copy L0 value for
> > > +  * compatibility.
> > > +  */
> > > + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)) {
> > 
> > Drop this if-else and only call tgl_compute_sagv_wm() on tgl+.
> > The comment can then go as well I think.
> 
> We actually had _agreed_ with you personally that I do copy
> wm0 values for other platforms for compatibility reasons.
> Now after one month you say that we are going to call this
> only for gen12. 

I see no point in having this populated for pre-tgl.

> 
> > 
> > > +         u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0];
> > > +
> > > +         latency += dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
> > > +         skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, 0, latency,
> > > +                              wm_params, &levels[0],
> > > +                              sagv_wm);
> > > +         DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%d L0 blocks required for SAGV vs %d for 
> > > non-SAGV\n",
> > > +                       sagv_wm->min_ddb_alloc, levels[0].min_ddb_alloc);
> > 
> > Leftover debugs. Pls remove.
> 
> I thought this might be useful, we should have some understanding what
> is happening, i.e what was the reasoning and why SAGV was switched on/off.
> Not crucial, but really don't understand why this is _that_ harmful.
> We have plenty of wm/ddb debugs anyway, but no way to figure out how SAGV 
> logic is working.

If we need more debugs they need to added carefully so as to not totally
blow up the logs. I think this here would spam the logs heavily.

> 
> > 
> > > + } else {
> > > +         /* Since all members are POD */
> > > +         *sagv_wm = levels[0];
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> > > *crtc_state,
> > >                                 const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> > >                                 struct skl_plane_wm *wm)
> > > @@ -5296,6 +5381,8 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct 
> > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > >           return ret;
> > >  
> > >   skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->wm);
> > > + if (color_plane == 0)
> > 
> > We do want this for both the Y plane and UV plane.
> > 
> > > +         tgl_compute_sagv_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm);
> > >   skl_compute_transition_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm);
> > >  
> > >   return 0;
> > > @@ -5702,6 +5789,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state 
> > > *state)
> > >                               enast(new_wm->wm[7].ignore_lines), 
> > > new_wm->wm[7].plane_res_l,
> > >                               enast(new_wm->trans_wm.ignore_lines), 
> > > new_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_l);
> > >  
> > > +                 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > +                             "[PLANE:%d:%s] sagv wm0 lines %4d -> %4d\n",
> > > +                             plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> > > +                             old_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_l,
> > > +                             new_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_l);
> > > +
> > 
> > IIRC I already suggested just slapping these onto the existing debug
> > prints instead of bloating the debug output with extra lines.
> > 
> > Ie instead of 
> > wms ... -> ...
> > sagv wm ... -> ...
> > 
> > we just get
> > wms ...,old_sagv_wm0 -> ...,new_sagv_wm0
> > 
> > just like we already do for eg. the transition wm.
> 
> Not sure about this one. I will check, I thought you suggested the opposite,
> i.e do those debugs separately.
> 
> Stan
> > 
> > >                   drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > >                               "[PLANE:%d:%s]  blocks 
> > > %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d"
> > >                               " -> %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d\n",
> > > @@ -5717,6 +5810,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state 
> > > *state)
> > >                               new_wm->wm[6].plane_res_b, 
> > > new_wm->wm[7].plane_res_b,
> > >                               new_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_b);
> > >  
> > > +                 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > +                             "[PLANE:%d:%s] sagv wm0 blocks %4d -> 
> > > %4d\n",
> > > +                             plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> > > +                             old_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_b,
> > > +                             new_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_b);
> > > +
> > >                   drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > >                               "[PLANE:%d:%s] min_ddb 
> > > %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d"
> > >                               " -> %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d\n",
> > > @@ -5731,6 +5830,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state 
> > > *state)
> > >                               new_wm->wm[4].min_ddb_alloc, 
> > > new_wm->wm[5].min_ddb_alloc,
> > >                               new_wm->wm[6].min_ddb_alloc, 
> > > new_wm->wm[7].min_ddb_alloc,
> > >                               new_wm->trans_wm.min_ddb_alloc);
> > > +
> > > +                 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > +                             "[PLANE:%d:%s] sagv wm0 min ddb %4d -> 
> > > %4d\n",
> > > +                             plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> > > +                             old_wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc,
> > > +                             new_wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc);
> > >           }
> > >   }
> > >  }
> > > @@ -6023,6 +6128,9 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc 
> > > *crtc,
> > >                   skl_wm_level_from_reg_val(val, &wm->wm[level]);
> > >           }
> > >  
> > > +         memcpy(&wm->sagv_wm0, &wm->wm[0],
> > > +                sizeof(struct skl_wm_level));
> > 
> > A simple assignment should suffice?
> 
> Agree.
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > >           if (plane_id != PLANE_CURSOR)
> > >                   val = I915_READ(PLANE_WM_TRANS(pipe, plane_id));
> > >           else
> > > -- 
> > > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to