On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:45:04AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > In kernel modeset driver mode we're in full control of the chip,
> > always. So there's no need at all to set mm.suspended in
> > i915_gem_idle. Hence move that out into the leavevt ioctl. Since
> > i915_gem_idle doesn't suspend gem any more we can also drop the
> > re-enabling for KMS in the thaw function.
> >
> > Also clean up the handling of mm.suspend at driver load by coalescing
> > all the assignments.
> >
> > Stumbled over while reading through our resume code for unrelated
> > reasons.
> >
> > v2: Shovel mm.suspended into the (newly created) ums dungeon as
> > suggested by Chris Wilson. The plan is that once we've completely
> > stopped relying on the register save/restore code we could shovel even
> > that in there.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
>
> Minor comments inline. Doing the rename in the same patch made it much
> easier to check all the users,
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
I've merged the updated version with the nitpicks fixed, thanks for your
review.
-Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 16 +++++++--------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 ++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 24 +++++++++++++----------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 31
> > ++++++++++++++++++------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > index 0e22142..beca2d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > @@ -1323,10 +1323,8 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device
> > *dev)
> > /* Always safe in the mode setting case. */
> > /* FIXME: do pre/post-mode set stuff in core KMS code */
> > dev->vblank_disable_allowed = 1;
> > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_pipes == 0) {
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 0;
> > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_pipes == 0)
> > return 0;
> > - }
> >
> > ret = intel_fbdev_init(dev);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -1352,9 +1350,6 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device
> > *dev)
> >
> > drm_kms_helper_poll_init(dev);
> >
> > - /* We're off and running w/KMS */
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 0;
> > -
> > return 0;
> >
> > cleanup_gem:
> > @@ -1629,9 +1624,6 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned
> > long flags)
> > goto out_gem_unload;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Start out suspended */
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 1;
> > -
> > if (HAS_POWER_WELL(dev))
> > i915_init_power_well(dev);
> >
> > @@ -1641,6 +1633,12 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev,
> > unsigned long flags)
> > DRM_ERROR("failed to init modeset\n");
> > goto out_gem_unload;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* We're off and running w/KMS */
> > + dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended = 0;
>
> Just don't bother touching it here (we kzalloc our driver private).
>
> > + } else {
> > + /* Start out suspended in ums mode. */
> > + dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended = 1;
> > }
> >
> > i915_setup_sysfs(dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index e6dc81c..50a76f59 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -661,7 +661,6 @@ static int __i915_drm_thaw(struct drm_device *dev)
> > intel_init_pch_refclk(dev);
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 0;
> >
> > error = i915_gem_init_hw(dev);
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > @@ -960,11 +959,11 @@ int i915_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> > * switched away).
> > */
> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET) ||
> > - !dev_priv->mm.suspended) {
> > + !dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
> > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> > int i;
> >
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 0;
> > + dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended = 0;
> >
> > i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index c8d6104..be2fcd3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -814,6 +814,18 @@ struct i915_dri1_state {
> > uint32_t counter;
> > };
> >
> > +struct i915_ums_state {
> > + /**
> > + * Flag if the X Server, and thus DRM, is not currently in
> > + * control of the device.
> > + *
> > + * This is set between LeaveVT and EnterVT. It needs to be
> > + * replaced with a semaphore. It also needs to be
> > + * transitioned away from for kernel modesetting.
> > + */
> > + int mm_suspended;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct intel_l3_parity {
> > u32 *remap_info;
> > struct work_struct error_work;
> > @@ -884,16 +896,6 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
> > */
> > bool interruptible;
> >
> > - /**
> > - * Flag if the X Server, and thus DRM, is not currently in
> > - * control of the device.
> > - *
> > - * This is set between LeaveVT and EnterVT. It needs to be
> > - * replaced with a semaphore. It also needs to be
> > - * transitioned away from for kernel modesetting.
> > - */
> > - int suspended;
> > -
> > /** Bit 6 swizzling required for X tiling */
> > uint32_t bit_6_swizzle_x;
> > /** Bit 6 swizzling required for Y tiling */
> > @@ -1187,6 +1189,8 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
> > /* Old dri1 support infrastructure, beware the dragons ya fools entering
> > * here! */
> > struct i915_dri1_state dri1;
> > + /* Old ums support infrastructure, same warning applies. */
> > + struct i915_ums_state ums;
> > } drm_i915_private_t;
> >
> > /* Iterate over initialised rings */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > index af61be8..5ad9f35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > @@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> > trace_i915_gem_request_add(ring, request->seqno);
> > ring->outstanding_lazy_request = 0;
> >
> > - if (!dev_priv->mm.suspended) {
> > + if (!dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
> > if (i915_enable_hangcheck) {
> > mod_timer(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_timer,
> > round_jiffies_up(jiffies +
> > DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));
> > @@ -2387,7 +2387,7 @@ i915_gem_retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > idle &= list_empty(&ring->request_list);
> > }
> >
> > - if (!dev_priv->mm.suspended && !idle)
> > + if (!dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended && !idle)
> > queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->mm.retire_work,
> > round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ));
> > if (idle)
> > @@ -3983,7 +3983,7 @@ i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > - if (dev_priv->mm.suspended) {
> > + if (dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -3999,11 +3999,6 @@ i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
> > if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> > i915_gem_evict_everything(dev);
> >
> > - /* Hack! Don't let anybody do execbuf while we don't control the chip.
> > - * We need to replace this with a semaphore, or something.
> > - * And not confound mm.suspended!
> > - */
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 1;
> > del_timer_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_timer);
> >
> > i915_kernel_lost_context(dev);
> > @@ -4220,7 +4215,7 @@ int
> > i915_gem_entervt_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > struct drm_file *file_priv)
> > {
> > - drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> > @@ -4232,7 +4227,7 @@ i915_gem_entervt_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> > *data,
> > }
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 0;
> > + dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended = 0;
> >
> > ret = i915_gem_init_hw(dev);
> > if (ret != 0) {
> > @@ -4252,7 +4247,7 @@ i915_gem_entervt_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> > *data,
> > cleanup_ringbuffer:
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
> > - dev_priv->mm.suspended = 1;
> > + dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended = 1;
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > return ret;
> > @@ -4262,11 +4257,23 @@ int
> > i915_gem_leavevt_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > struct drm_file *file_priv)
> > {
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> > return 0;
> >
> > drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
> > - return i915_gem_idle(dev);
> > + ret = i915_gem_idle(dev);
> > +
> > + /* Hack! Don't let anybody do execbuf while we don't control the chip.
> > + * We need to replace this with a semaphore, or something.
> > + * And not confound ums.mm_suspended!
> > + */
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended = 1;
>
> ARGH. The locking, it hurts. Please never show this code in public again.
> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
