On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:52:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:46:00PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > If intel_sdvo_get_value() fails here, val is unitialized and the cross > > check won't check anything. > > > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > index b8e1623..4481f6a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c > > @@ -1357,7 +1357,10 @@ static void intel_sdvo_get_config(struct > > intel_encoder *encoder, > > } > > > > /* Cross check the port pixel multiplier with the sdvo encoder state. */ > > - intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT, &val, 1); > > + if (!intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT, > > + &val, 1)) > > + return; > > But now it fails silently instead of being paranoid ... Can we just shut > up the tool instead?
We absolutely can! (and it's done). -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
