Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes:

> If we only submit the first port, leaving the second empty yet have
> ready requests pending in the queue, use that to set the timeslicing
> priority (i.e. the priority at which we will decided to enabling

s/decided/decide

> timeslicing and evict the currently active context if the queue is of
> equal priority after its quantum expired).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 33b7173b7195..92c3368ffcbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ static int
>  switch_prio(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, const struct i915_request *rq)
>  {
>       if (list_is_last(&rq->sched.link, &engine->active.requests))
> -             return INT_MIN;
> +             return engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint;
>  
>       return rq_prio(list_next_entry(rq, sched.link));
>  }
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to