On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 07:57:36PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> HPD pin handling for RKL+TGP is a special case; we effectively select
> the HPD pin based on the DDI (A,B,D,E) rather than the PHY (A,B,C,D).
> This differs from the regular behavior of RKL+CMP (and also TGL+TGP).
> 
> v2:
>  - Rather than providing a custom hpd_pin mapping table, just assign
>    encoder->hpd_pin in a custom manner for this setup.  (Ville)
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> index 4f6f560e093e..d794dd5f170c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,15 @@ enum hpd_pin intel_hpd_pin_default(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>  {
>       enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, port);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * RKL + TGP PCH is a special case; we effectively choose the hpd_pin
> +      * based on the DDI rather than the PHY (i.e., the last two outputs
> +      * shold be HPD_PORT_{D,E} rather than {C,D}.  Note that this differs
> +      * from the behavior of both TGL+TGP and RKL+CMP.
> +      */
> +     if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) && HAS_PCH_TGP(dev_priv))
> +             return HPD_PORT_A + port - PORT_A;
> +
>       switch (phy) {
>       case PHY_F:
>               return IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv) ? HPD_PORT_E : HPD_PORT_F;
> -- 
> 2.24.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to