Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> gen3 does not fully flush MI stores to memory on MI_FLUSH, such that a
> subsequent read from e.g. the sampler can bypass the store and read the
> stale value from memory. This is a serious issue when we are using MI
> stores to rewrite the batches for relocation, as it means that the batch
> is reading from random user/kernel memory. While it is particularly
> sensitive [and detectable] for relocations, reading stale data at any
> time is a worry.
>
> Having started with a small number of delaying stores and doubling until
> no more incoherency was seen over a few hours (with and without
> background memory pressure), 32 was the magic number.
>
> v2: Follow more closer with the gen5 w/a and include some
> post-invalidate flushes as well.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2018
> References: a889580c087a ("drm/i915: Flush GPU relocs harder for gen3")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c | 61 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c
> index 3fb0dc1fb910..5400d657f334 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c
> @@ -13,28 +13,25 @@
>  
>  int gen2_emit_flush(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode)
>  {
> -     unsigned int num_store_dw;
> +     unsigned int num_store_dw = 12;
>       u32 cmd, *cs;
>  
>       cmd = MI_FLUSH;
> -     num_store_dw = 0;
>       if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE)
>               cmd |= MI_READ_FLUSH;
> -     if (mode & EMIT_FLUSH)
> -             num_store_dw = 4;
>  
> -     cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 2 + 3 * num_store_dw);
> +     cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 2 + 4 * num_store_dw);
>       if (IS_ERR(cs))
>               return PTR_ERR(cs);
>  
>       *cs++ = cmd;
>       while (num_store_dw--) {
> -             *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | MI_MEM_VIRTUAL;
> -             *cs++ = intel_gt_scratch_offset(rq->engine->gt,
> -                                             INTEL_GT_SCRATCH_FIELD_DEFAULT);
> -             *cs++ = 0;
> +             *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX;
> +             *cs++ = I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH * sizeof(u32);
> +             *cs++ = rq->fence.seqno - 1;
> +             *cs++ = MI_FLUSH | MI_NO_WRITE_FLUSH;
>       }
> -     *cs++ = MI_FLUSH | MI_NO_WRITE_FLUSH;
> +     *cs++ = cmd;
>  
>       intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
>  
> @@ -142,38 +139,21 @@ int gen4_emit_flush_vcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 
> mode)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -u32 *gen3_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs)
> +static u32 *__gen2_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs,
> +                                int flush, int post)
>  {
>       GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_ggtt != 
> rq->engine->status_page.vma);
>       
> GEM_BUG_ON(offset_in_page(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_offset) != 
> I915_GEM_HWS_SEQNO_ADDR);
>  
>       *cs++ = MI_FLUSH;
>  
> -     *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX;
> -     *cs++ = I915_GEM_HWS_SEQNO_ADDR;
> -     *cs++ = rq->fence.seqno;
> -
> -     *cs++ = MI_USER_INTERRUPT;

How can you throw the interrupt part out?
-Mika
> -     *cs++ = MI_NOOP;
> -
> -     rq->tail = intel_ring_offset(rq, cs);
> -     assert_ring_tail_valid(rq->ring, rq->tail);
> -
> -     return cs;
> -}
> -
> -#define GEN5_WA_STORES 8 /* must be at least 1! */
> -u32 *gen5_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs)
> -{
> -     int i;
> -
> -     GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_ggtt != 
> rq->engine->status_page.vma);
> -     
> GEM_BUG_ON(offset_in_page(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_offset) != 
> I915_GEM_HWS_SEQNO_ADDR);
> -
> -     *cs++ = MI_FLUSH;
> +     while (flush--) {
> +             *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX;
> +             *cs++ = I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH * sizeof(u32);
> +             *cs++ = rq->fence.seqno;
> +     }
>  
> -     BUILD_BUG_ON(GEN5_WA_STORES < 1);
> -     for (i = 0; i < GEN5_WA_STORES; i++) {
> +     while (post--) {
>               *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX;
>               *cs++ = I915_GEM_HWS_SEQNO_ADDR;
>               *cs++ = rq->fence.seqno;
> @@ -186,7 +166,16 @@ u32 *gen5_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 
> *cs)
>  
>       return cs;
>  }
> -#undef GEN5_WA_STORES
> +
> +u32 *gen3_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs)
> +{
> +     return __gen2_emit_breadcrumb(rq, cs, 16, 8);
> +}
> +
> +u32 *gen5_emit_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs)
> +{
> +     return __gen2_emit_breadcrumb(rq, cs, 8, 8);
> +}
>  
>  /* Just userspace ABI convention to limit the wa batch bo to a resonable 
> size */
>  #define I830_BATCH_LIMIT SZ_256K
> -- 
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to