Hi Jason,
Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences
outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something
changed?
Thanks, Daniel
> + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring
> + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having
> to
> + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of
> + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts.
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:12:06PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Two in one go:
> - it is allowed to call dma_fence_wait() while holding a
> dma_resv_lock(). This is fundamental to how eviction works with ttm,
> so required.
>
> - it is allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from memory reclaim contexts,
> specifically from shrinker callbacks (which i915 does), and from mmu
> notifier callbacks (which amdgpu does, and which i915 sometimes also
> does, and probably always should, but that's kinda a debate). Also
> for stuff like HMM we really need to be able to do this, or things
> get real dicey.
>
> Consequence is that any critical path necessary to get to a
> dma_fence_signal for a fence must never a) call dma_resv_lock nor b)
> allocate memory with GFP_KERNEL. Also by implication of
> dma_resv_lock(), no userspace faulting allowed. That's some supremely
> obnoxious limitations, which is why we need to sprinkle the right
> annotations to all relevant paths.
>
> The one big locking context we're leaving out here is mmu notifiers,
> added in
>
> commit 23b68395c7c78a764e8963fc15a7cfd318bf187f
> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Date: Mon Aug 26 22:14:21 2019 +0200
>
> mm/mmu_notifiers: add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end
>
> that one covers a lot of other callsites, and it's also allowed to
> wait on dma-fences from mmu notifiers. But there's no ready-made
> functions exposed to prime this, so I've left it out for now.
>
> v2: Also track against mmu notifier context.
>
> v3: kerneldoc to spec the cross-driver contract. Note that currently
> i915 throws in a hard-coded 10s timeout on foreign fences (not sure
> why that was done, but it's there), which is why that rule is worded
> with SHOULD instead of MUST.
>
> Also some of the mmu_notifier/shrinker rules might surprise SoC
> drivers, I haven't fully audited them all. Which is infeasible anyway,
> we'll need to run them with lockdep and dma-fence annotations and see
> what goes boom.
>
> v4: A spelling fix from Mika
>
> v5: #ifdef for CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER. Reported by 0day. Unfortunately
> this means lockdep enforcement is slightly inconsistent, it won't spot
> GFP_NOIO and GFP_NOFS allocations in the wrong spot if
> CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER is disabled in the kernel config. Oh well.
>
> v5: Note that only drivers/gpu has a reasonable (or at least
> historical) excuse to use dma_fence_wait() from shrinker and mmu
> notifier callbacks. Everyone else should either have a better memory
> manager model, or better hardware. This reflects discussions with
> Jason Gunthorpe.
>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>
> Cc: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@intel.com> (v4)
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellst...@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 6 ++++
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 8 +++++
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> index 05d856131140..f8f6decde359 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ DMA Fences
> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> :doc: DMA fences overview
>
> +DMA Fence Cross-Driver Contract
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> + :doc: fence cross-driver contract
> +
> DMA Fence Signalling Annotations
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 0005bc002529..af1d8ea926b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,52 @@ static atomic64_t dma_fence_context_counter =
> ATOMIC64_INIT(1);
> * &dma_buf.resv pointer.
> */
>
> +/**
> + * DOC: fence cross-driver contract
> + *
> + * Since &dma_fence provide a cross driver contract, all drivers must follow
> the
> + * same rules:
> + *
> + * * Fences must complete in a reasonable time. Fences which represent
> kernels
> + * and shaders submitted by userspace, which could run forever, must be
> backed
> + * up by timeout and gpu hang recovery code. Minimally that code must
> prevent
> + * further command submission and force complete all in-flight fences, e.g.
> + * when the driver or hardware do not support gpu reset, or if the gpu
> reset
> + * failed for some reason. Ideally the driver supports gpu recovery which
> only
> + * affects the offending userspace context, and no other userspace
> + * submissions.
> + *
> + * * Drivers may have different ideas of what completion within a reasonable
> + * time means. Some hang recovery code uses a fixed timeout, others a mix
> + * between observing forward progress and increasingly strict timeouts.
> + * Drivers should not try to second guess timeout handling of fences from
> + * other drivers.
> + *
> + * * To ensure there's no deadlocks of dma_fence_wait() against other locks
> + * drivers should annotate all code required to reach dma_fence_signal(),
> + * which completes the fences, with dma_fence_begin_signalling() and
> + * dma_fence_end_signalling().
> + *
> + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() while holding
> dma_resv_lock().
> + * This means any code required for fence completion cannot acquire a
> + * &dma_resv lock. Note that this also pulls in the entire established
> + * locking hierarchy around dma_resv_lock() and dma_resv_unlock().
> + *
> + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &shrinker
> + * callbacks. This means any code required for fence completion cannot
> + * allocate memory with GFP_KERNEL.
> + *
> + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &mmu_notifier
> + * respectively &mmu_interval_notifier callbacks. This means any code
> required
> + * for fence completeion cannot allocate memory with GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO.
> + * Only GFP_ATOMIC is permissible, which might fail.
> + *
> + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring
> + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having
> to
> + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of
> + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts.
> + */
> +
> static const char *dma_fence_stub_get_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> return "stub";
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> index e7d7197d48ce..0e6675ec1d11 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
>
> /**
> * DOC: Reservation Object Overview
> @@ -116,6 +117,13 @@ static int __init dma_resv_lockdep(void)
> if (ret == -EDEADLK)
> dma_resv_lock_slow(&obj, &ctx);
> fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
> + lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map);
> + __dma_fence_might_wait();
> + lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map);
> +#else
> + __dma_fence_might_wait();
> +#endif
> fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
> ww_mutex_unlock(&obj.lock);
> ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index 3f288f7db2ef..09e23adb351d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(struct dma_fence __rcu **fencep)
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void);
> void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie);
> +void __dma_fence_might_wait(void);
> #else
> static inline bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void)
> {
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
