From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Explicitly check for i830 when assigning the .get_cdclk() vfunc, and then deal with the case of not having assigned the vfunc separately. Less confusing, and gets rid of the checkpatch complaint about using {} on one branch but not the others.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c index 72095ef14426..9d6cacbdb691 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c @@ -2903,9 +2903,10 @@ void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = i85x_get_cdclk; else if (IS_I845G(dev_priv)) dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = fixed_200mhz_get_cdclk; - else { /* 830 */ - drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, !IS_I830(dev_priv), - "Unknown platform. Assuming 133 MHz CDCLK\n"); + else if (IS_I830(dev_priv)) + dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = fixed_133mhz_get_cdclk; + + if (drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, !dev_priv->display.get_cdclk, + "Unknown platform. Assuming 133 MHz CDCLK\n")) dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = fixed_133mhz_get_cdclk; - } } -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
