Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]> writes:

> From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
>
> We have this POSTING_READ inside ironlake_irq_handler. I suppose we
> also want it on IVB because we want to stop the IRQ handler as soon as
> possible at this point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 7bc36ae..bdaab93 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1310,6 +1310,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ivybridge_irq_handler(int irq, void 
> *arg)
>       /* disable master interrupt before clearing iir  */
>       de_ier = I915_READ(DEIER);
>       I915_WRITE(DEIER, de_ier & ~DE_MASTER_IRQ_CONTROL);
> +     POSTING_READ(DEIER);
>  
>       /* Disable south interrupts. We'll only write to SDEIIR once, so further
>        * interrupts will will be stored on its back queue, and then we'll be
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to