On 21/08/2020 10:54, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:45:23AM +0300, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/08/2020 20:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
Use PRI[du]64 as necessary for 32bit builds.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>

Was this for just 1/4 or the whole series?


Just for this patch.


-Lionel


This one is for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latv...@intel.com>



Thanks!

-Lionel

---
   tests/i915/perf.c                    | 8 ++++----
   tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c | 2 +-
   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c
index 92edc9f1f..a894fd382 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf.c
@@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ test_blocking(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool 
set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ke
        user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
        kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
-       igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no 
more than %d)\n",
+       igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling 
(expect no more than %d)\n",
                  n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
        igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. 
context switches)\n",
                  n_extra_iterations);
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ test_polling(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool 
set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ker
        user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
        kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
-       igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect 
no more than %d)\n",
+       igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling 
(expect no more than %d)\n",
                  n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
        igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. 
context switches)\n",
                  n_extra_iterations);
@@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct 
drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
        int64_t start, end;
        int num_reports = 0;
-       igt_debug("Expected duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
+       igt_debug("Expected duration = %"PRId64"\n", *duration_ns);
        stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, param, true);
@@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct 
drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
        *duration_ns = end - start;
-       igt_debug("Actual duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
+       igt_debug("Actual duration = %"PRIu64"\n", *duration_ns);
        return num_reports;
   }
diff --git a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c 
b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
index 7671f39b4..adc41c29f 100644
--- a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
+++ b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
        }
        ctx.oa_exponent = oa_exponent_for_period(ctx.timestamp_frequency, 
perf_period);
-       fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%lu 
oa_exponent=%u\n",
+       fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%"PRIu64" 
oa_exponent=%u\n",
                ctx.metric_set->perf_oa_metrics_set, ctx.oa_exponent);
        ctx.perf_fd = perf_open(&ctx);

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to