Hi Chris,

> -     /* Check results match the legacy GET_PARAM (where we can). */
> +     /* Confirm the individual engines exist with EXECBUFFER2 */
>       for (i = 0; i < engines->num_engines; i++) {
>               struct drm_i915_engine_info *engine =
>                       (struct drm_i915_engine_info *)&engines->engines[i];
> +             I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES(p_engines, 1) = {
> +                     .engines = { engine->engine }
> +             };
> +             struct drm_i915_gem_context_param param = {
> +                     .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
> +                     .value = to_user_pointer(&p_engines),
> +                     .size = sizeof(p_engines),
> +             };
> +
> +             struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {};
> +             struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
> +                     .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
> +                     .buffer_count = 1,
> +             };
>  
>               igt_debug("%u: class=%u instance=%u flags=%llx 
> capabilities=%llx\n",
>                         i,
> @@ -689,6 +713,15 @@ static void engines(int fd)
>                         engine->engine.engine_instance,
>                         engine->flags,
>                         engine->capabilities);
> +             gem_context_set_param(fd, &param);
> +             igt_assert_eq(__gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf), -ENOENT);
> +     }
> +     gem_context_reset_engines(fd, 0);
> +
> +     /* Check results match the legacy GET_PARAM (where we can). */
> +     for (i = 0; i < engines->num_engines; i++) {
> +             struct drm_i915_engine_info *engine =
> +                     (struct drm_i915_engine_info *)&engines->engines[i];

I would have liked it with one single for loop, perhaps resetting
engines individually.

But this works, as well and I'm not strong with this:

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.sh...@intel.com>

Andi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to