On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:59:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> We shouldn't really trust tc_mode on non-TC PHYs since we never
> initialize it explicitly. So let's check for the PHY type first.
> Fortunately TC_PORT_TBT_ALT happens to be zero so I don't think
> there's an actual bug here, just a possibility for a future one
> if someone rearranges the enum values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index efcdf5499903..5bc5033a2dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3463,10 +3463,12 @@ icl_program_mg_dp_mode(struct intel_digital_port 
> *dig_port,
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
>       enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
> +     enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
>       u32 ln0, ln1, pin_assignment;
>       u8 width;
>  
> -     if (dig_port->tc_mode == TC_PORT_TBT_ALT)
> +     if (!intel_phy_is_tc(dev_priv, phy) ||
> +         dig_port->tc_mode == TC_PORT_TBT_ALT)
>               return;
>  
>       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to