On Tue, 09 Feb 2021, Saichandana S <[email protected]> wrote: > This debugfs provides the display PM debug information like Time > to Next VBI and Time to Next Fill from Display Engine <-> PCU Mailbox.
We still lack a rationale for this and the test design. In past review, I got the impression that a) you need the wakeref, but b) grabbing the wakeref messes up the test. What are you testing? What are you trying to achieve? BR, Jani. PS. You leak the wakeref and stay up indefinitely if csr isn't loaded. > > V2: > Added a functional print to debugfs. [Jani Nikula] > > V3: > Used separate variables to store the register values and also > used REG_GENMASK and REG_BIT for mask preparation. [Anshuman Gupta] > > Removed reading of register contents. Replaced local variable with yesno(). > Placed register macros separately, distinguishing from other > macros. [Jani Nikula] > > V4 : Used i915 as local variable. [Anshuman Gupta, Jani Nikula] > > V5 : Added wakeref to wakeup device. [Chris Wilson] > Signed-off-by: Saichandana S <[email protected]> > --- > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > index d6e4a9237bda..29aaa41fdeec 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > @@ -591,6 +591,29 @@ static int i915_dmc_info(struct seq_file *m, void > *unused) > return 0; > } > > +static int i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > +{ > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private); > + struct intel_csr *csr = &i915->csr; > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > + > + if (!HAS_CSR(i915)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm); > + if (!csr->dmc_payload) > + return 0; Leak. > + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next Fill : 0x%08x\n", > + intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) & PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK); > + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next VBI : 0x%08x\n", > + (intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) & PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK) >> > 16); > + seq_printf(m, "Selective Exit Latency : 0x%08x\n", > + intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_1) & > PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK); > + > + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref); > + return 0; > +} > + > static void intel_seq_print_mode(struct seq_file *m, int tabs, > const struct drm_display_mode *mode) > { > @@ -2128,6 +2151,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list > intel_display_debugfs_list[] = { > {"i915_edp_psr_status", i915_edp_psr_status, 0}, > {"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0}, > {"i915_dmc_info", i915_dmc_info, 0}, > + {"i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info", i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info, 0}, > {"i915_display_info", i915_display_info, 0}, > {"i915_shared_dplls_info", i915_shared_dplls_info, 0}, > {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0}, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 224ad897af34..93d319bf80fd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -12525,4 +12525,13 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX 0x2 > #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT 0x4 > > +/*These registers are of functional registers for PM debug request and > response registers*/ > +#define PM_REQ_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x45284) > +#define PM_REQ_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45288) > +#define PM_RSP_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x4528C) > +#define PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 0) > +#define PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 16) > +#define PM_RSP_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45290) > +#define PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK REG_GENMASK(2, 0) > + > #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */ -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
