On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:25:23PM +0300, [email protected] wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > The clock in crtc->mode doesn't necessarily mean anything. Let's look > at the clock in adjusted_mode instead. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <[email protected]> -- Damien > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 48d93d3..397628b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ > > static bool intel_crtc_active(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > { > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc); > + > /* Be paranoid as we can arrive here with only partial > * state retrieved from the hardware during setup. > */ > - return to_intel_crtc(crtc)->active && crtc->fb && crtc->mode.clock; > + return intel_crtc->active && crtc->fb && > + intel_crtc->config.adjusted_mode.clock; > } > > static void i8xx_disable_fbc(struct drm_device *dev) > -- > 1.8.1.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
