Let's try to be more aggressive on the power savings, but not as much as 0.1s that caused us some regression in the past.
Also let's have this in a separated patch so that can be bisected and increased back (or reverted) as needed. Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Cc: David Weinehall <[email protected]> Cc: Tilak Tangudu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index 8f052bd4f58c..3244ac85d13c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) */ dev_pm_set_driver_flags(kdev, DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE); - pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(kdev, 10000); /* 10s */ + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(kdev, 1000); /* 1s */ pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev); /* -- 2.31.1
