On 22/09/2021 10:10, Christian König wrote:
Abstract the complexity of iterating over all the fences
in a dma_resv object.
The new loop handles the whole RCU and retry dance and
returns only fences where we can be sure we grabbed the
right one.
v2: fix accessing the shared fences while they might be freed,
improve kerneldoc, rename _cursor to _iter, add
dma_resv_iter_is_exclusive, add dma_resv_iter_begin/end
v3: restructor the code, move rcu_read_lock()/unlock() into the
iterator, add dma_resv_iter_is_restarted()
v4: fix NULL deref when no explicit fence exists, drop superflous
rcu_read_lock()/unlock() calls.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/dma-resv.h | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 190 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
index 84fbe60629e3..7768140ab36d 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
@@ -323,6 +323,101 @@ void dma_resv_add_excl_fence(struct dma_resv *obj, struct
dma_fence *fence)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_add_excl_fence);
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_restart_unlocked - restart the unlocked iterator
+ * @cursor: The dma_resv_iter object to restart
+ *
+ * Restart the unlocked iteration by initializing the cursor object.
+ */
+static void dma_resv_iter_restart_unlocked(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ cursor->seq = read_seqcount_begin(&cursor->obj->seq);
+ cursor->index = -1;
+ if (cursor->all_fences)
+ cursor->fences = dma_resv_shared_list(cursor->obj);
+ else
+ cursor->fences = NULL;
+ cursor->is_restarted = true;
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_walk_unlocked - walk over fences in a dma_resv obj
+ * @cursor: cursor to record the current position
+ *
+ * Return all the fences in the dma_resv object which are not yet signaled.
+ * The returned fence has an extra local reference so will stay alive.
+ * If a concurrent modify is detected the whole iterration is started over
again.
iteration
+ */
+static void dma_resv_iter_walk_unlocked(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ struct dma_resv *obj = cursor->obj;
+
+ do {
+ /* Drop the reference from the previous round */
+ dma_fence_put(cursor->fence);
+
+ if (cursor->index++ == -1) {
+ cursor->fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj);
+
+ } else if (!cursor->fences ||
+ cursor->index >= cursor->fences->shared_count) {
+ cursor->fence = NULL;
+
+ } else {
+ struct dma_resv_list *fences = cursor->fences;
+ unsigned int idx = cursor->index;
+
+ cursor->fence = rcu_dereference(fences->shared[idx]);
+ }
+ if (cursor->fence)
+ cursor->fence = dma_fence_get_rcu(cursor->fence);
+ } while (cursor->fence && dma_fence_is_signaled(cursor->fence));
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked - first fence in an unlocked dma_resv obj.
+ * @cursor: the cursor with the current position
+ *
+ * Returns the first fence from an unlocked dma_resv obj.
+ */
+struct dma_fence *dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ do {
+ dma_resv_iter_restart_unlocked(cursor);
+ dma_resv_iter_walk_unlocked(cursor);
+ } while (read_seqcount_retry(&cursor->obj->seq, cursor->seq));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return cursor->fence;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked);
Why is this one split from dma_resv_iter_begin and even exported? I
couldn't find any users in the series.
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_next_unlocked - next fence in an unlocked dma_resv obj.
+ * @cursor: the cursor with the current position
+ *
+ * Returns the next fence from an unlocked dma_resv obj.
+ */
+struct dma_fence *dma_resv_iter_next_unlocked(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ bool restart;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ cursor->is_restarted = false;
+ restart = read_seqcount_retry(&cursor->obj->seq, cursor->seq);
+ do {
+ if (restart)
+ dma_resv_iter_restart_unlocked(cursor);
+ dma_resv_iter_walk_unlocked(cursor);
+ restart = true;
+ } while (read_seqcount_retry(&cursor->obj->seq, cursor->seq));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return cursor->fence;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_iter_next_unlocked);
Couldn't dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked and dma_resv_iter_next_unlocked
share the same implementation? Especially if you are able to replace
cursor->is_restarted with cursor->index == -1.
+
/**
* dma_resv_copy_fences - Copy all fences from src to dst.
* @dst: the destination reservation object
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-resv.h b/include/linux/dma-resv.h
index 9100dd3dc21f..baf77a542392 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-resv.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-resv.h
@@ -149,6 +149,101 @@ struct dma_resv {
struct dma_resv_list __rcu *fence;
};
+/**
+ * struct dma_resv_iter - current position into the dma_resv fences
+ *
+ * Don't touch this directly in the driver, use the accessor function instead.
+ */
+struct dma_resv_iter {
+ /** @obj: The dma_resv object we iterate over */
+ struct dma_resv *obj;
+
+ /** @all_fences: If all fences should be returned */
+ bool all_fences;
+
+ /** @fence: the currently handled fence */
+ struct dma_fence *fence;
+
+ /** @seq: sequence number to check for modifications */
+ unsigned int seq;
+
+ /** @index: index into the shared fences */
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ /** @fences: the shared fences */
+ struct dma_resv_list *fences;
+
+ /** @is_restarted: true if this is the first returned fence */
+ bool is_restarted;
+};
+
+struct dma_fence *dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor);
+struct dma_fence *dma_resv_iter_next_unlocked(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor);
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_begin - initialize a dma_resv_iter object
+ * @cursor: The dma_resv_iter object to initialize
+ * @obj: The dma_resv object which we want to iterator over
iterate
+ * @all_fences: If all fences should be returned or just the exclusive one
+ */
+static inline void dma_resv_iter_begin(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor,
+ struct dma_resv *obj,
+ bool all_fences)
+{
+ cursor->obj = obj;
+ cursor->all_fences = all_fences;
+ cursor->fence = NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_end - cleanup a dma_resv_iter object
+ * @cursor: the dma_resv_iter object which should be cleaned up
+ *
+ * Make sure that the reference to the fence in the cursor is properly
+ * dropped.
+ */
+static inline void dma_resv_iter_end(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ dma_fence_put(cursor->fence);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_is_exclusive - test if the current fence is the exclusive one
+ * @cursor: the cursor of the current position
+ *
+ * Returns true if the currently returned fence is the exclusive one.
+ */
+static inline bool dma_resv_iter_is_exclusive(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ return cursor->index == -1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_iter_is_restarted - test if this is the first fence after a restart
+ * @cursor: the cursor with the current position
+ *
+ * Return true if this is the first fence in an interation after a restart.
iteration
+ */
+static inline bool dma_resv_iter_is_restarted(struct dma_resv_iter *cursor)
+{
+ return cursor->is_restarted;
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked - unlocked fence iterator
+ * @cursor: a struct dma_resv_iter pointer
+ * @fence: the current fence
+ *
+ * Iterate over the fences in a struct dma_resv object without holding the
+ * &dma_resv.lock and using RCU instead. The cursor needs to be initialized
+ * with dma_resv_iter_begin() and cleaned up with dma_resv_iter_end(). Inside
+ * the iterator a reference to the dma_fence is hold and the RCU lock dropped.
held
+ * When the dma_resv is modified the iteration starts over again.
+ */
+#define dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(cursor, fence)
\
+ for (fence = dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked(cursor); \
+ fence; fence = dma_resv_iter_next_unlocked(cursor))
+
#define dma_resv_held(obj) lockdep_is_held(&(obj)->lock.base)
#define dma_resv_assert_held(obj) lockdep_assert_held(&(obj)->lock.base)
Regards,
Tvrtko
