On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:51:06PM +0530, Thanneeru Srinivasulu wrote:
> Inject probe errors -ENXIO, -EBUSY for CT send.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thanneeru Srinivasulu <thanneeru.srinivas...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> index 83764db0fd6d..8ffef3abd3da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> @@ -765,6 +765,14 @@ int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32
> *action, u32 len,
> u32 status = ~0; /* undefined */
> int ret;
>
> + ret = i915_inject_probe_error(ct_to_i915(ct), -ENXIO);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
I don't see where -ENXIO is returned during an error that we handle
unless I am missing something. If we don't return -ENXIO anywhere else I
don't think we need to inject this error.
Matt
> + ret = i915_inject_probe_error(ct_to_i915(ct), -EBUSY);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (unlikely(!ct->enabled)) {
> struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
> struct intel_uc *uc = container_of(guc, struct intel_uc, guc);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
