On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:17 PM Ville Syrjala <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > Let's add lpt_pch_disable() as the counterpart to > lpt_pch_enable(). > > Note that unlike the ilk+ code the fdi_link_train() > and fdi_disable() calls are still left directly in > intel_crt.c. If we wanted to move those we'd need to > add lpt_pch_pre_enable(). But the two fdi direct fdi > calls are pretry symmetric so it doesn't seem too bad > to just keep them as is. > > Cc: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
apart from krobot suggestions. Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
