On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 18:45 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > These are userspace objects, so mark them as such. In a later patch > it's > useful to determine how paranoid we need to be when managing cache > flushes. In theory no functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dmabuf: add paranoid fl... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/userptr: add paranoid f... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/shmem: ensure flush dur... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: mark up internal objec... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: expand on the kernel-d... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/selftests: mark up huge... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series start... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting ... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting wit... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting wit... Patchwork
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: mark dmabuf object... Thomas Hellström
