On 11/8/2021 10:32 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021, "Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX"    
<[email protected]> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
Sent: 09 November 2021 00:37
To: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
<[email protected]>; intel-
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/gt: Hold RPM wakelock during
PXP suspend

On Mon, 08 Nov 2021, Tejas Upadhyay
<[email protected]> wrote:
selftest --r live shows failure in suspend tests when RPM wakelock is
not acquired during suspend.

This changes addresses below error :
<4> [154.177535] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access <4>
[154.177575] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 5772 at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h:113
fwtable_write32+0x240/0x320 [i915]
<4> [154.177974] Modules linked in: i915(+) vgem drm_shmem_helper fuse
snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
ledtrig_audio mei_hdcp mei_pxp x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp
crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_intel_dspcfg
snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep igc snd_hda_core ttm mei_me ptp snd_pcm
prime_numbers mei i2c_i801 pps_core i2c_smbus intel_lpss_pci btusb
btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc [last unloaded: i915]
<4> [154.178143] CPU: 4 PID: 5772 Comm: i915_selftest Tainted: G
U            5.15.0-rc6-CI-Patchwork_21432+ #1
<4> [154.178154] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/TUF
GAMING
Z590-PLUS WIFI, BIOS 0811 04/06/2021 <4> [154.178160] RIP:
0010:fwtable_write32+0x240/0x320 [i915] <4> [154.178604] Code: 15 7b
e1 0f 0b e9 34 fe ff ff 80 3d a9 89 31
00 00 0f 85 31 fe ff ff 48 c7 c7 88 9e 4f a0 c6 05 95 89 31 00 01 e8
c0 15 7b e1 <0f> 0b e9 17 fe ff ff 8b 05 0f 83 58 e2 85 c0 0f 85 8d
00 00 00 48
<4> [154.178614] RSP: 0018:ffffc900016279f0 EFLAGS: 00010286 <4>
[154.178626] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888204fe0ee0
RCX: 0000000000000001
<4> [154.178634] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: ffffffff823142b5
RDI: 00000000ffffffff
<4> [154.178641] RBP: 00000000000320f0 R08: 0000000000000000
R09: c0000000ffffcd5a
<4> [154.178647] R10: 00000000000f8c90 R11: ffffc90001627808
R12: 0000000000000000
<4> [154.178654] R13: 0000000040000000 R14: ffffffffa04d12e0
R15: 0000000000000000
<4> [154.178660] FS:  00007f7390aa4c00(0000) GS:ffff88844f000000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [154.178669] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4>
[154.178675] CR2: 000055bc40595028 CR3: 0000000204474005
CR4: 0000000000770ee0
<4> [154.178682] PKRU: 55555554
<4> [154.178687] Call Trace:
<4> [154.178706]  intel_pxp_fini_hw+0x23/0x30 [i915] <4> [154.179284]
intel_pxp_suspend+0x1f/0x30 [i915] <4> [154.179807]
live_gt_resume+0x5b/0x90 [i915]

Changes since V1 :
        - split the HW access parts in gt_suspend_late - Daniele
        - Remove default PXP configs

Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay
<[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c   |  7 ++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
index b4a8594bc46c..d4029de1c80d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ void intel_gt_suspend_prepare(struct intel_gt *gt)
        user_forcewake(gt, true);
        wait_for_suspend(gt);

-       intel_pxp_suspend(&gt->pxp, false);
+       intel_pxp_suspend_prepare(&gt->pxp, false);
  }

  static suspend_state_t pm_suspend_target(void) @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@
void intel_gt_suspend_late(struct intel_gt *gt)
        GEM_BUG_ON(gt->awake);

        intel_uc_suspend(&gt->uc);
+       intel_pxp_suspend(&gt->pxp);

        /*
         * On disabling the device, we want to turn off HW access to memory
@@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ void intel_gt_suspend_late(struct intel_gt *gt)

  void intel_gt_runtime_suspend(struct intel_gt *gt)  {
-       intel_pxp_suspend(&gt->pxp, true);
+       intel_pxp_runtime_suspend(&gt->pxp);
        intel_uc_runtime_suspend(&gt->uc);

        GT_TRACE(gt, "\n");
@@ -373,7 +374,7 @@ int intel_gt_runtime_resume(struct intel_gt *gt)
        if (ret)
                return ret;

-       intel_pxp_resume(&gt->pxp);
+       intel_pxp_runtime_resume(&gt->pxp);

        return 0;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.c
index 23fd86de5a24..3f91996dc6be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.c
@@ -7,8 +7,9 @@
  #include "intel_pxp_irq.h"
  #include "intel_pxp_pm.h"
  #include "intel_pxp_session.h"
+#include "i915_drv.h"

-void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp, bool runtime)
+void intel_pxp_suspend_prepare(struct intel_pxp *pxp, bool runtime)
  {
        if (!intel_pxp_is_enabled(pxp))
                return;
@@ -23,10 +24,18 @@ void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp, bool
runtime)
         */
        if (!runtime)
                intel_pxp_invalidate(pxp);
+}

-       intel_pxp_fini_hw(pxp);
+void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp) {
+       intel_wakeref_t wakeref;

-       pxp->hw_state_invalidated = false;
+       if (!intel_pxp_is_enabled(pxp))
+               return;
+       with_intel_runtime_pm(&pxp_to_gt(pxp)->i915->runtime_pm,
wakeref) {
+               intel_pxp_fini_hw(pxp);
+               pxp->hw_state_invalidated = false;
+       }
  }

  void intel_pxp_resume(struct intel_pxp *pxp) diff --git
a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.h
index c89e97a0c3d0..f2cf3117ed93 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_pm.h
@@ -9,10 +9,15 @@
  #include "intel_pxp_types.h"

  #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_PXP
-void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp, bool runtime);
+void intel_pxp_suspend_prepare(struct intel_pxp *pxp, bool runtime);
+void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp);
  void intel_pxp_resume(struct intel_pxp *pxp);  #else -static inline
void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp, bool runtime)
+static inline void intel_pxp_suspend_prepare(struct intel_pxp *pxp,
+bool runtime) { }
+
+static inline void intel_pxp_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp)
  {
  }

@@ -20,5 +25,14 @@ static inline void intel_pxp_resume(struct
intel_pxp *pxp)  {  }  #endif
+static inline void intel_pxp_runtime_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp) {
+       intel_pxp_suspend_prepare(pxp, true);
+       intel_pxp_suspend(pxp);
+}

+static inline void intel_pxp_runtime_resume(struct intel_pxp *pxp) {
+       intel_pxp_resume(pxp);
+}
For the casual reader, the pxp suspend/resume functions have become an
impossible interface to use correctly without digging into the source code.

Separate runtime suspend/resume calls *and* a suspend function with
runtime parameter?!?
Hi Daniele, would you be ok if I add runtime arg? Please let me know what do 
you think.
Err, please *avoid* having runtime as parameter.

BR,
Jani.

Might be better to just open-code the runtime_suspend function, i.e.:

void intel_pxp_runtime_suspend(struct intel_pxp *pxp)
{
        if (!intel_pxp_is_enabled(pxp))
                return;

        pxp->arb_is_valid = false;
        pxp->hw_state_invalidated = false;

        intel_pxp_fini_hw(pxp);
}


And remove the bool param from suspend_prepare. No changes required for the resume. Note that the change above requires the function to be moved to the C file, with an empty implementation to be added in the header for when the PXP config is not set (basically the same thing we do for the pxp_suspend function).

Daniele


Thanks,
Tejas
BR,
Jani.

  #endif /* __INTEL_PXP_PM_H__ */
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to