On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:50:50PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:09:51AM +0300, Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
> > Ensures that the batch buffer is executed by the resource streamer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |    2 ++
> >  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                |    5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > index 0ce0d47..4a56c58 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > @@ -962,6 +962,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> > *data,
> >     case I915_EXEC_DEFAULT:
> >     case I915_EXEC_RENDER:
> >             ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS];
> > +           flags |= (args->flags & I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER) ?
> > +             I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER : 0;
> 
> Besides this being flags |= args->flags & I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER;
> flags is a completely different bitfield and you should be translating
> into a dispatch value rather than the execbuffer value.
> -Chris
> 

To decrypt Chris just a bit, though he was rather more verbose than
usual ;-), see the translation of I915_EXEC_SECURE to
I915_DISPATCH_SECURE.

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to