On 1/26/22 09:15, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> We call __save_depot_stack() unconditionally so the stack depot
Ah, in __untrack_all_wakerefs()? Looks like I missed it, sorry.
> must always be initialized or else we'll oops on platforms without
> runtime pm support.
>
> Presumably we've not seen this in CI due to stack_depot_init()
> already getting called via drm_mm_init()+CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MM.
>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com>
> Cc: Marco Elver <el...@google.com> # stackdepot
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> Fixes: 2dba5eb1c73b ("lib/stackdepot: allow optional init and stack_table
> allocation by kvmalloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 53f1ccb78849..64c2708efc9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -68,9 +68,7 @@ static noinline depot_stack_handle_t
> __save_depot_stack(void)
> static void init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> {
> spin_lock_init(&rpm->debug.lock);
> -
> - if (rpm->available)
> - stack_depot_init();
> + stack_depot_init();
> }
>
> static noinline depot_stack_handle_t
