On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 06:08:25PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
+#define MEMSWCTL _MMIO(0x11170) /* Ironlake only */ +#define MEMCTL_CMD_MASK 0xe000 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_SHIFT 13 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_RCLK_OFF 0 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_RCLK_ON 1 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_CHFREQ 2 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_CHVID 3 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_VMMOFF 4 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_VMMON 5 +#define MEMCTL_CMD_STS (1 << 12) /* write 1 triggers command, clears +when command complete */
formatting issue here
+#define GEN9_SLICE_PGCTL_ACK(slice) _MMIO(0x804c + (slice) * 0x4) +#define GEN10_SLICE_PGCTL_ACK(slice) _MMIO(0x804c + ((slice) / 3) * 0x34 + \ +((slice) % 3) * 0x4)
and here
+#define GEN9_PGCTL_SLICE_ACK (1 << 0) +#define GEN9_PGCTL_SS_ACK(subslice) (1 << (2 + (subslice) * 2)) +#define GEN10_PGCTL_VALID_SS_MASK(slice) ((slice) == 0 ? 0x7F : 0x1F) + +#define GEN9_SS01_EU_PGCTL_ACK(slice) _MMIO(0x805c + (slice) * 0x8) +#define GEN10_SS01_EU_PGCTL_ACK(slice) _MMIO(0x805c + ((slice) / 3) * 0x30 + \ +((slice) % 3) * 0x8)
and here
+#define GEN9_SS23_EU_PGCTL_ACK(slice) _MMIO(0x8060 + (slice) * 0x8) +#define GEN10_SS23_EU_PGCTL_ACK(slice) _MMIO(0x8060 + ((slice) / 3) * 0x30 + \ +((slice) % 3) * 0x8)
and here. Rest looks sane. There's already a conflict in this patch, although following "this should be just code move", it's easy to solve. I wonder what is the strategy going to be for merging this because it will conflict badly between drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> Lucas De Marchi
